Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Irish Are #1

  • For the 4th-straight week, Notre Dame and Alabama alternate as #1
  • (11-0) Coastal Carolina, which has handed #16 BYU (winners at #25 Boise St.) and #14 Louisiana (winners at #23 Iowa St.) their only losses, has earned the #4 ranking based on accomplishments to date
  • Undefeated USC qualifies for the rankings for the first time and premiers at #5
  • In all, 123 teams now qualify for the rankings, based on the standard of having played at least 4 games
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 13

Dec. 6 Rankings
Nov. 30 Rankings
Nov. 23 Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Notre Dame
.848
10
0
.583
37
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.841
5
0
.569
45
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Alabama
.840
10
0
.568
47
1-0
1-0
0
4.
Coastal Car.
.815
11
0
.525
63
0-0
2-0
0
5.
USC
.809
5
0
.514
69
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Clemson
.807
9
1
.596
30
1-1
0-0
0
7.
Cincinnati
.803
8
0
.504
77
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Texas A&M
.785
7
1
.581
40
0-1
1-0
0
9.
Miami, Fla.
.785
8
2
.632
12
0-1
1-1
0
10.
Indiana
.778
6
1
.583
38
0-1
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
San Jose State
.772
6
0
.458
99
  Atlantic Coast
.568
12
3
.382
12.
Northwestern
.768
6
1
.569
44
  American Athletic
.556
12
7
.476
13.
Georgia
.756
7
2
.607
26
  Big 12
.553
6
3
.452
14.
Louisiana 
.750
9
1
.513
72
  Sun Belt
.483
16
14
.463
15.
N.C. State
.743
8
3
.623
19
  Conference USA
.412
16
21
.452
16.
BYU
.742
10
1
.496
82
  Pac-12
N/A
1
0
N/A
17.
Tulsa
.741
6
1
.533
59
  Southeastern
N/A
0
0
N/A
18.
Florida
.737
8
2
.569
46
  Big Ten
N/A
0
0
N/A
19.
North Carolina
.736
8
3
.614
22
  Mountain West
N/A
1
3
N/A
20.
Colorado
.719
4
1
.546
57
  Mid-American
N/A
0
0
N/A
21.
Iowa
.708
6
2
.566
48
  *non-conference play
22.
Buffalo
.699
5
0
.367
123
 
23.
Iowa State
.692
8
2
.513
70
 
24.
Washington
.679
3
1
.532
60
 
25.
Boise State
.671
5
1
.466
94
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Auburn
.667
6
4
.612
24
 
79.
Oregon State .482 2 4 .582 39
27.
Pittsburgh
.658
6
5
.633
11
 
80.
Hawaii .479 4 4 .479 90
28.
Boston College
.651
6
5
.625
17
 
81.
Toledo .478 4 2 .379 119
29.
Virginia Tech
.650
5
6
.674
1
 
82.
Florida Atlantic .475 5 3 .401 115
30.
UCF
.646
6
3
.549
56
 
83.
Illinois .464 2 5 .595 32
31.
Marshall
.639
7
1
.402
114
 
84.
East Carolina .459 3 6 .560 49
32.
Utah
.638
2
2
.638
7
 
85.
Mississippi State .456 2 7 .626 15
33.
Virginia
.637
5
5
.637
9
 
86.
Troy .453 5 6 .480 89
34.
Oklahoma State
.637
7
3
.518
66
 
87.
Duke .452 2 9 .648 6
35.
Oklahoma
.634
7
2
.464
96
 
88.
Navy .450 3 7 .572 43
36.
Ball State
.632
5
1
.424
110
 
89.
Kansas State .445 4 6 .505 76
37.
Liberty
.630
9
1
.374
121
 
90.
Texas Tech .426 4 6 .486 88
38.
Missouri
.623
5
4
.591
34
 
91.
South Carolina .424 2 8 .610 25
39.
Wake Forest
.616
4
4
.616
21
 
92.
Western Kentucky .421 5 6 .448 101
40.
Appalachian St.
.613
8
3
.475
91
 
93.
South Alabama .418 4 7 .500 80
41.
Memphis
.612
7
3
.492
84
 
94.
Arkansas State .409 4 7 .491 85
42.
Stanford
.611
3
2
.552
53
 
95.
Syracuse .408 1 10 .669 2
43.
SMU
.608
7
3
.487
87
 
96.
Central Michigan .406 3 3 .406 112
44.
Texas
.601
6
3
.501
79
 
97.
California .405 1 3 .559 50
45.
Army
.591
8
2
.405
113
 
98.
Fresno State .391 3 3 .391 118
46.
Oregon
.586
3
2
.526
62
 
99.
Rice .382 2 3 .441 105
47.
Wisconsin
.580
2
3
.637
8
 
100.
New Mexico .362 2 5 .490 86
48.
Nevada
.579
6
2
.426
109
 
101.
North Texas .361 4 5 .393 116
49.
Air Force
.577
3
2
.518
67
 
102.
Baylor .356 2 7 .525 64
50.
Mississippi
.575
4
4
.575
42
 
103.
Wyoming .351 2 4 .447 102
51.
UAB
.574
5
3
.499
81
 
104.
Texas State .349 2 10 .555 52
52.
LSU
.574
4
5
.606
27
 
105.
Eastern Michigan .348 2 4 .445 103
53.
Maryland
.570
2
3
.628
13
 
106.
Mid. Tenn. St. .341 3 6 .437 106
54.
TCU
.563
6
4
.503
78
 
107.
Charlotte .339 2 4 .435 107
55.
Louisville
.556
4
7
.635
10
 
108.
South Florida .332 1 8 .577 41
56.
Houston
.553
3
4
.595
31
 
109.
Southern Miss .327 3 7 .442 104
57.
Penn State
.553
3
5
.626
16
 
110.
Colorado State .326 1 3 .474 92
58.
Minnesota
.550
3
3
.550
55
 
111.
Temple .310 1 6 .529 61
59.
Tulane
.548
6
5
.521
65
 
112.
Utah State .309 1 5 .511 73
60.
Georgia State
.546
5
4
.513
71
 
113.
UTEP .304 3 5 .372 122
61.
Arkansas
.543
3
7
.660
3
 
114.
Arizona .287 0 5 .617 20
62.
Kentucky
.537
4
6
.596
29
 
115.
Akron .272 1 5 .466 95
63.
UCLA
.537
3
3
.537
58
 
116.
Vanderbilt .264 0 9 .589 35
64.
Michigan State
.534
2
5
.660
4
 
117.
Kansas .238 0 9 .556 51
65.
Georgia Tech
.530
3
7
.648
5
 
118.
Massachusetts .235 0 4 .551 54
66.
Kent State
.529
3
1
.377
120
 
119.
UNLV .207 0 6 .510 74
67.
Florida State
.529
3
6
.627
14
 
120.
LA Monroe .206 0 10 .510 75
68.
Rutgers
.525
3
5
.600
28
 
121.
Northern Illinois .196 0 6 .494 83
69.
Georgia Southern
.522
7
5
.472
93
 
122.
Bowling Green .169 0 5 .449 100
70.
San Diego State
.516
4
4
.516
68
 
123.
Fla. International .148 0 5 .410 111
71.
Tennessee
.513
3
6
.613
23
 
124.
72.
UTSA
.511
7
4
.429
108
 
125.
73.
West Virginia
.497
5
4
.464
97
 
126.
74.
Nebraska
.496
2
5
.625
18
 
127.
75.
Michigan
.493
2
4
.594
33
 
128.
76.
Louisiana Tech
.493
5
4
.460
98
 
129.
77.
Western Michigan
.492
4
2
.392
117
 
130.
78.
Purdue
.485
2
4
.586
36
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2020 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved