Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Coastal Carolina Cracks the Top-4

  • The top spot in the rankings continues to bounce back and forth between Alabama and Notre Dame
  • #1 Alabama, #2 Notre Dame, #3 Ohio State, and #4 Coastal Carolina are the only teams that are undefeated and have wins versus the current top-20 (with Alabama, Notre Dame, and Coastal Carolina each having 2 such wins)
  • Eight more teams now qualify for the rankings (for a total of 121), on the basis of their having played a minimum of 4 games
  • Two Pac-12 teams—Colorado and Washington—are newly eligible for the rankings and crack the top-25
  • Among the five conferences that have played enough non-conference games to be eligible for the conference rankings, the ACC and American Athletic Conference are battling for the top spot (separated by just .006), while the Sun Belt is closer to the Big 12 (.038 behind) than the Big 12 is to the American (.042 behind)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 6

Nov. 30 Rankings
Nov. 23 Rankings

Final 2019-20 Rankings
Final ’19 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.845
9
0
.576
40
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.842
10
0
.570
43
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.841
5
0
.569
44
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Coastal Car.
.817
10
0
.528
60
0-0
2-0
0
5.
Clemson
.808
9
1
.596
31
1-1
2-0
0
6.
Colorado
.807
4
0
.512
70
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Miami, Fla.
.807
8
1
.604
25
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Cincinnati
.803
8
0
.505
74
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Texas A&M
.788
7
1
.585
36
1-1
0-0
0
10.
Florida
.782
8
1
.566
47
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Indiana
.781
6
1
.588
35
  Atlantic Coast
.570
12
3
.384
12.
Northwestern
.780
5
1
.603
26
  American Athletic
.564
12
6
.463
13.
San Jose State
.757
5
0
.438
99
  Big 12
.522
5
3
.447
14.
Louisiana 
.747
9
1
.510
72
  Sun Belt
.484
16
14
.464
15.
N.C. State
.743
8
3
.623
16
  Conference USA
.415
16
20
.447
16.
Georgia
.742
6
2
.608
23
  Pac-12
N/A
1
0
N/A
17.
BYU
.738
9
1
.498
78
  Southeastern
N/A
0
0
N/A
18.
Tulsa
.738
6
1
.529
58
  Big Ten
N/A
0
0
N/A
19.
Buffalo
.719
4
0
.390
116
  Mountain West
N/A
1
2
N/A
20.
North Carolina
.708
7
3
.597
29
  Mid-American
N/A
0
0
N/A
21.
Washington
.687
3
1
.541
55
  *non-conference play
22.
Iowa
.682
5
2
.559
50
 
23.
Boise State
.680
4
1
.500
75
 
24.
Virginia
.662
5
4
.631
12
 
25.
Wake Forest
.659
4
3
.620
18
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Marshall
.654
7
1
.418
108
 
79.
Hawaii
.471
3
4
.514
67
27.
Iowa State
.654
8
2
.470
86
 
80.
Navy
.469
3
6
.570
42
28.
Auburn
.650
5
4
.619
20
 
81.
Rutgers
.465
2
5
.595
32
29.
UCF
.648
6
3
.551
54
 
82.
Central Michigan
.462
3
2
.403
113
30.
Boston College
.645
6
5
.619
19
 
83.
East Carolina
.461
3
6
.562
48
31.
Maryland
.643
2
2
.643
7
 
84.
Mississippi State
.460
2
6
.613
21
32.
Missouri
.641
5
3
.569
45
 
85.
Illinois
.459
2
4
.560
49
33.
Pittsburgh
.631
5
5
.631
13
 
86.
West Virginia
.455
5
4
.422
105
34.
Liberty
.625
9
1
.369
119
 
87.
Troy
.453
5
5
.453
94
35.
Wisconsin
.620
2
2
.620
17
 
88.
Toledo
.426
3
2
.368
120
36.
Virginia Tech
.618
4
6
.673
1
 
89.
South Carolina
.423
2
8
.609
22
37.
Nevada
.616
6
1
.391
115
 
90.
South Alabama
.416
4
7
.498
77
38.
SMU
.606
7
3
.485
82
 
91.
California
.414
1
3
.568
46
39.
Ball State
.606
4
1
.419
107
 
92.
Syracuse
.404
1
10
.665
3
40.
Stanford
.605
2
2
.605
24
 
93.
Rice
.403
2
2
.403
112
41.
Appalachian St.
.600
7
3
.479
85
 
94.
Kansas State
.403
4
6
.462
89
42.
Houston
.596
3
3
.596
30
 
95.
Arkansas State
.402
4
7
.483
83
43.
Oklahoma
.594
7
2
.422
106
 
96.
Western Kentucky
.399
4
6
.458
92
44.
Oregon
.593
3
2
.534
56
 
97.
Charlotte
.397
2
3
.456
93
45.
Oklahoma State
.593
6
3
.492
79
 
98.
Texas Tech
.385
4
6
.443
97
46.
UCLA
.591
3
2
.531
57
 
99.
Wyoming
.358
2
3
.415
111
47.
Memphis
.587
6
3
.486
81
 
100.
Texas State
.349
2
10
.555
52
48.
Mississippi
.580
4
4
.580
37
 
101.
North Texas
.346
3
5
.417
110
49.
Army
.574
7
2
.403
114
 
102.
UTEP
.343
3
4
.383
117
50.
Michigan State
.570
2
4
.666
2
 
103.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.341
3
6
.437
100
51.
UAB
.564
4
3
.521
62
 
104.
Colorado State
.341
1
3
.490
80
52.
Texas
.562
6
3
.461
90
 
105.
South Florida
.333
1
8
.578
39
53.
Florida Atlantic
.560
5
2
.429
103
 
106.
Baylor
.317
2
6
.463
88
54.
Air Force
.560
3
2
.500
76
 
107.
Utah State
.315
1
5
.517
65
55.
San Diego State
.557
4
3
.514
66
 
108.
Arizona
.313
0
4
.645
6
56.
Georgia Southern
.550
7
4
.468
87
 
109.
Temple
.310
1
6
.529
59
57.
Georgia State
.546
5
4
.513
68
 
110.
New Mexico
.306
1
5
.507
73
58.
Tulane
.546
6
5
.519
63
 
111.
Eastern Michigan
.304
1
4
.482
84
59.
Kentucky
.542
4
6
.601
27
 
112.
Southern Miss
.283
2
7
.442
98
60.
Georgia Tech
.542
3
6
.639
8
 
113.
Vanderbilt
.272
0
8
.599
28
61.
Arkansas
.537
3
6
.635
10
 
114.
Akron
.266
1
4
.436
102
62.
Western Michigan
.537
4
1
.353
121
 
115.
Massachusetts
.256
0
4
.579
38
63.
Kent State
.530
3
1
.378
118
 
116.
UNLV
.218
0
5
.527
61
64.
Nebraska
.527
2
4
.626
15
 
117.
Northern Illinois
.212
0
5
.518
64
65.
Louisiana Tech
.522
5
3
.447
95
 
118.
Kansas
.208
0
9
.513
69
66.
UTSA
.518
7
4
.436
101
 
119.
LA Monroe
.207
0
10
.512
71
67.
LSU
.516
3
5
.590
33
 
120.
Bowling Green
.167
0
5
.445
96
68.
Louisville
.511
3
7
.630
14
 
121.
Fla. International
.154
0
5
.422
104
69.
Tennessee
.507
2
6
.656
5
 
122.
70.
Penn State
.505
2
5
.634
11
 
123.
71.
Oregon State
.497
2
3
.557
51
 
124.
72.
Minnesota
.493
2
3
.553
53
 
125.
73.
TCU
.492
5
4
.459
91
 
126.
74.
Michigan
.488
2
4
.589
34
 
127.
75.
Florida State
.486
2
6
.637
9
 
128.
76.
Duke
.481
2
8
.663
4
 
129.
77.
Fresno State
.477
3
2
.418
109
 
130.
78.
Purdue
.473
2
4
.574
41
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2020 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved