Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

The Top-3 Remains Unchanged

  • Through the first 8 weeks of the season, Oklahoma St., Alabama, and LSU have accomplished more than any other teams in the nation
  • Kansas St. (7-0 with road wins over #23 Texas Tech and #37 Miami) has been the 4th-most-accomplished team to date — but a showdown with #8 Oklahoma looms
  • Boise St. rounds out the top-5
  • Of the 10 toughest schedules to date, 9 have been played by either Big 12 or SEC teams (with the other having been played by Arizona)
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has the best regular season in all of sports, and this coming week will feature several more top-flight matchups: #8 Oklahoma at #4 Kansas St.; #7 Stanford at #11 USC; #19 Michigan St. at #21 Nebraska; and #6 Clemson at #31 Georgia Tech
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 23

Oct. 16 Rankings
Oct. 9 Rankings
Oct. 2 Rankings

Final 2010-11 Rankings
Final '10 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oklahoma State
.853
7
0
.592
8
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Alabama
.836
8
0
.559
18
0-0
2-0
0
3.
LSU
.825
8
0
.541
31
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Kansas State
.818
7
0
.529
36
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Boise State
.815
7
0
.523
39
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Clemson
.796
8
0
.493
60
0-0
2-0
0
7.
Stanford
.782
7
0
.473
75
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Oklahoma
.769
6
1
.571
15
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Houston
.761
7
0
.443
92
0-0
0-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.757
6
1
.555
20
0-0
1-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. USC
.749
6
1
.544
30
  Big 12
.695
27
3
.445
12. Virginia Tech
.743
7
1
.523
38
  Southeastern
.646
31
4
.401
13. Arkansas
.732
6
1
.522
40
  Big Ten
.555
34
13
.419
14. Texas A&M
.729
5
2
.614
3
  Pac-12
.554
21
12
.472
15. Oregon
.729
6
1
.518
43
  Atlantic Coast
.551
29
11
.414
16. Michigan
.727
6
1
.516
44
  Big East
.540
25
13
.445
17. Penn State
.710
7
1
.481
69
  Conference USA
.469
21
24
.489
18. Texas
.708
4
2
.618
2
  Mountain West
.446
19
18
.438
19. Michigan State
.704
6
1
.488
63
  Mid-American
.419
21
30
.472
20. Georgia
.696
5
2
.575
12
  Sun Belt
.411
11
20
.498
21. Nebraska
.690
6
1
.471
78
  WAC
.389
12
23
.483
22. Auburn
.682
5
3
.613
4
  *non-conference play
23. Texas Tech
.675
5
2
.551
22
 
24. Southern Miss
.663
6
1
.440
97
 
25. Wisconsin
.662
6
1
.439
99
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Arizona State
.659
5
2
.533
35
 
74.
Louisville
.462
3
4
.505
51
27.
Baylor
.648
4
2
.551
21
 
75.
Arizona
.462
2
5
.593
7
28.
Syracuse
.641
5
2
.513
46
 
76.
Wyoming
.461
4
2
.363
120
29.
Cincinnati
.640
6
1
.415
111
 
77.
Western Michigan
.458
4
4
.458
82
30.
Washington
.628
5
2
.499
57
 
78.
San Jose State
.458
3
4
.501
56
31.
Georgia Tech
.628
6
2
.476
72
 
79.
Mississippi
.455
2
5
.586
9
32.
West Virginia
.626
5
2
.497
59
 
80.
Ohio
.453
5
3
.379
118
33.
Illinois
.624
6
2
.471
77
 
81.
Air Force
.440
3
4
.482
67
34.
Wake Forest
.621
5
2
.492
61
 
82.
Pittsburgh
.439
3
4
.482
68
35.
North Carolina
.618
5
3
.545
29
 
83.
North Texas
.436
3
5
.512
49
36.
Notre Dame
.617
4
3
.575
11
 
84.
Hawaii
.435
4
3
.393
117
37.
Miami, Fla.
.615
4
3
.573
13
 
85.
Maryland
.430
2
5
.561
17
38.
Florida
.613
4
3
.571
14
 
86.
Connecticut
.425
3
4
.468
80
39.
SMU
.603
5
2
.473
74
 
87.
Duke
.424
3
4
.467
81
40.
Ohio State
.593
4
3
.551
23
 
88.
Rice
.419
2
5
.550
24
41.
BYU
.593
6
2
.439
98
 
89.
Bowling Green
.417
4
4
.417
110
42.
Tulsa
.588
4
3
.546
27
 
90.
Fresno State
.409
3
5
.484
65
43.
Vanderbilt
.588
4
3
.545
28
 
91.
Washington State
.401
3
4
.443
91
44.
Rutgers
.587
5
2
.456
83
 
92.
Louisiana Tech
.401
3
4
.442
93
45.
TCU
.567
5
2
.436
103
 
93.
Troy
.398
2
4
.498
58
46.
Toledo
.567
5
3
.492
62
 
94.
Central Florida
.384
3
4
.425
108
47.
LA Lafayette
.566
6
2
.413
112
 
95.
Colorado State
.377
3
4
.418
109
48.
Arkansas State
.565
5
2
.434
104
 
96.
Northwestern
.374
2
5
.503
52
49.
Florida State
.564
4
3
.521
41
 
97.
Oregon State
.373
2
5
.502
54
50.
Iowa
.562
5
2
.431
105
 
98.
Navy
.372
2
5
.501
55
51.
Nevada
.557
4
3
.515
45
 
99.
Western Kentucky
.353
3
4
.394
116
52.
Tennessee
.557
3
4
.599
5
 
100.
LA Monroe
.353
2
5
.480
70
53.
Missouri
.554
3
4
.596
6
 
101.
New Mexico State
.333
3
4
.373
119
54.
California
.550
4
3
.508
50
 
102.
Central Michigan
.330
2
6
.478
71
55.
San Diego State
.541
4
2
.440
96
 
103.
Army
.327
2
5
.452
86
56.
Mississippi State
.535
3
4
.578
10
 
104.
Miami, Ohio
.326
2
5
.451
87
57.
South Florida
.528
4
3
.485
64
 
105.
Utah State
.325
2
5
.449
88
58.
UCLA
.519
3
4
.562
16
 
106.
Colorado
.315
1
7
.548
25
59.
Ball State
.516
5
3
.441
94
 
107.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.312
2
4
.405
114
60.
Iowa State
.516
3
4
.559
19
 
108.
Indiana
.304
1
7
.535
34
61.
Eastern Michigan
.512
5
3
.436
102
 
109.
Buffalo
.298
2
6
.441
95
62.
Purdue
.511
4
3
.469
79
 
110.
Boston College
.296
1
6
.512
47
63.
Temple
.504
5
3
.429
107
 
111.
Kent State
.295
1
6
.512
48
64.
Utah
.498
3
4
.541
32
 
112.
Memphis
.295
2
6
.437
101
65.
East Carolina
.497
3
4
.540
33
 
113.
Minnesota
.288
1
6
.502
53
66.
Kansas
.497
2
5
.626
1
 
114.
Tulane
.271
2
6
.408
113
67.
Virginia
.496
4
3
.453
84
 
115.
UAB
.265
1
6
.474
73
68.
N.C. State
.496
4
3
.453
85
 
116.
Akron
.264
1
6
.473
76
69.
Fla. International
.488
4
3
.445
90
 
117.
UNLV
.258
1
5
.448
89
70.
Kentucky
.475
3
4
.518
42
 
118.
Idaho
.238
1
6
.438
100
71.
Northern Illinois
.474
5
3
.400
115
 
119.
Florida Atlantic
.216
0
7
.524
37
72.
UTEP
.474
4
3
.431
106
 
120.
New Mexico
.189
0
7
.483
66
73.
Marshall
.472
3
5
.547
26
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2011 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved