Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Auburn Tigers Win the National Championship

Another Near-Perfect Season for the BCS

  • #1 Auburn achieves the 2nd-highest rating (.844) in the 13-year history of the BCS, behind only Texas in 2005-06 (.849)
  • The Tigers post 4 wins versus the final top-10 — more than the next 7 teams in the rankings combined
  • Rose Bowl champion TCU finishes #2; National Championship Game-loser Oregon, #3; Sugar Bowl champion Ohio State, #4; and Orange Bowl champion Stanford, #5
  • Fiesta Bowl champion Oklahoma finishes #6, and Cotton Bowl champion LSU, #7
  • The Big 12, SEC, and Pac-10 finish within .009 of each other in the final conference rankings
  • The SEC and Pac-10 were the strongest conferences at the top — with 2 Pac-10 teams in the top-5, and 4 SEC teams in the top-10 — while the Big 12 (5 teams in the top-20) was the strongest from top-to-bottom, as all but one Big 12 team finished with a rating over .500 (versus 3 teams apiece from the Pac-10 and SEC)
  • It's been another spectacular college football season!
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, 2010-11

Final Pre-Bowl Rankings
Nov. 28 Rankings
Nov. 21 Rankings
Nov. 14 Rankings
Nov. 7 Rankings
Oct. 31 Rankings
Oct. 24 Rankings
Oct. 17 Rankings
Oct. 10 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2009-10 Rankings
Final '09 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Auburn
.844
14
0
.575
7
4-0
2-0
0
2.
TCU
.807
13
0
.511
55
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Oregon
.782
12
1
.539
35
1-1
0-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.781
12
1
.538
36
1-0
0-1
0
5.
Stanford
.779
12
1
.534
39
0-1
2-0
0
6.
Oklahoma
.778
12
2
.583
5
0-0
3-2
0
7.
LSU
.765
11
2
.574
8
1-2
3-0
0
8.
Boise State
.760
12
1
.508
57
0-0
2-1
0
9.
Arkansas
.735
10
3
.587
3
1-3
3-0
0
10.
Alabama
.735
10
3
.587
4
1-2
2-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oklahoma State
.735
11
2
.534
40
  Big 12
.610
43
13
.446
12. Michigan State
.726
11
2
.523
46
  Southeastern
.607
46
12
.425
13. Missouri
.719
10
3
.567
13
  Pac-10
.601
23
12
.507
14. Wisconsin
.718
11
2
.513
54
  Big Ten
.570
38
14
.429
15. Nevada
.716
13
1
.447
91
  Atlantic Coast
.531
34
23
.473
16. Texas A&M
.696
9
4
.588
2
  Mountain West
.523
21
21
.523
17. Virginia Tech
.674
11
3
.503
60
  Big East
.504
28
18
.438
18. Florida State
.672
10
4
.547
25
  WAC
.500
25
19
.459
19. Nebraska
.669
10
4
.544
30
  Conference USA
.422
22
32
.477
20. Utah
.664
10
3
.503
59
  Mid-American
.346
17
39
.462
21. South Carolina
.655
9
5
.573
10
  Sun Belt
.306
6
33
.516
22. Mississippi State
.653
9
4
.540
34
  *non-conference play
23. Notre Dame
.635
8
5
.569
12
 
24. N.C. State
.631
9
4
.517
51
 
25. Florida
.626
8
5
.559
15
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Iowa
.615
8
5
.547
27
 
74.
Army
.447
7
6
.424
97
27.
USC
.613
8
5
.545
29
 
75.
Georgia Tech
.447
6
7
.469
81
28.
Texas Tech
.611
8
5
.543
32
 
76.
Mississippi
.440
4
8
.541
33
29.
West Virginia
.611
9
4
.495
65
 
77.
Idaho
.440
6
7
.462
84
30.
Hawaii
.602
10
4
.472
79
 
78.
Indiana
.436
5
7
.486
69
31.
Tulsa
.601
10
3
.435
93
 
79.
Ohio
.433
8
5
.366
116
32.
Maryland
.600
9
4
.484
71
 
80.
Troy
.433
8
5
.366
117
33.
Air Force
.595
9
4
.479
73
 
81.
Purdue
.431
4
8
.532
41
34.
Washington
.594
7
6
.572
11
 
82.
Cincinnati
.429
4
8
.530
42
35.
Central Florida
.587
11
3
.410
101
 
83.
Utah State
.413
4
8
.514
53
36.
Michigan
.581
7
6
.558
16
 
84.
Fla. International
.413
7
6
.391
109
37.
San Diego State
.580
9
4
.463
82
 
85.
Minnesota
.404
3
9
.557
17
38.
North Carolina
.577
8
5
.508
58
 
86.
Houston
.402
5
7
.451
88
39.
Penn State
.573
7
6
.550
21
 
87.
Marshall
.401
5
7
.450
89
40.
Illinois
.572
7
6
.550
22
 
88.
Kansas
.393
3
9
.546
28
41.
Arizona
.571
7
6
.548
24
 
89.
Western Michigan
.384
6
6
.384
112
42.
Pittsburgh
.568
8
5
.499
63
 
90.
UTEP
.378
6
7
.400
105
43.
Baylor
.566
7
6
.544
31
 
91.
Rutgers
.376
4
8
.474
76
44.
Navy
.565
9
4
.448
90
 
92.
Virginia
.375
4
8
.474
77
45.
Northern Illinois
.559
11
3
.382
113
 
93.
Wake Forest
.373
3
9
.525
44
46.
Miami, Fla.
.557
7
6
.534
38
 
94.
Colorado State
.368
3
9
.519
48
47.
Connecticut
.548
8
5
.479
74
 
95.
LA Monroe
.365
5
7
.413
100
48.
Fresno State
.547
8
5
.477
75
 
96.
Rice
.358
4
8
.455
85
49.
Kansas State
.542
7
6
.519
50
 
97.
Washington State
.353
2
10
.561
14
50.
Oregon State
.542
5
7
.591
1
 
98.
Wyoming
.349
3
9
.499
64
51.
BYU
.534
7
6
.511
56
 
99.
UAB
.346
4
8
.443
92
52.
South Florida
.532
8
5
.462
83
 
100.
Kent State
.345
5
7
.391
107
53.
Colorado
.527
5
7
.576
6
 
101.
Vanderbilt
.341
2
10
.547
26
54.
Iowa State
.524
5
7
.574
9
 
102.
Tulane
.336
4
8
.432
95
55.
Syracuse
.523
8
5
.453
87
 
103.
UNLV
.336
2
11
.551
20
56.
Miami, Ohio
.521
10
4
.391
108
 
104.
Duke
.334
3
9
.482
72
57.
Arizona State
.521
6
6
.521
47
 
105.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.309
6
7
.329
120
58.
Northwestern
.517
7
6
.494
66
 
106.
Arkansas State
.304
4
8
.396
106
59.
Georgia
.513
6
7
.536
37
 
107.
Florida Atlantic
.292
4
8
.382
114
60.
Boston College
.509
7
6
.486
68
 
108.
New Mexico State
.287
2
10
.484
70
61.
Clemson
.506
6
7
.529
43
 
109.
Central Michigan
.282
3
9
.422
98
62.
Texas
.506
5
7
.556
18
 
110.
Ball State
.263
4
8
.348
119
63.
Southern Miss
.502
8
5
.433
94
 
111.
New Mexico
.261
1
11
.515
52
64.
Tennessee
.501
6
7
.524
45
 
112.
San Jose State
.260
1
12
.519
49
65.
California
.499
5
7
.549
23
 
113.
LA Lafayette
.255
3
9
.389
110
66.
Temple
.479
8
4
.380
115
 
114.
Bowling Green
.241
2
10
.426
96
67.
Louisville
.478
7
6
.455
86
 
115.
North Texas
.237
3
9
.366
118
68.
East Carolina
.478
6
7
.501
61
 
116.
Eastern Michigan
.236
2
10
.419
99
69.
SMU
.472
7
7
.472
78
 
117.
Memphis
.228
1
11
.469
80
70.
Toledo
.470
8
5
.401
102
 
118.
Buffalo
.223
2
10
.401
104
71.
Kentucky
.468
6
7
.491
67
 
119.
Western Kentucky
.214
2
10
.388
111
72.
UCLA
.455
4
8
.556
19
 
120.
Akron
.182
1
11
.401
103
73.
Louisiana Tech
.450
5
7
.500
62
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2011 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved