Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Top Four Are Far Ahead

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

  • There is a 26-point gap (.026) between #4 Michigan and #5 Wisconsin, as well as a 28-point gap (.028) between #2 Ohio State and #3 Clemson
  • The 1-loss Buckeyes have played the nation’s toughest schedule to date, and it’s about to get tougher
  • Michigan heads to Ohio State this coming weekend, while #8 Washington travels to #28 Washington State, and #1 Alabama hosts #19 Auburn
  • The SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12, and ACC each have at least 3 teams ranked above the top Big 12 team (#17 Oklahoma)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 21

Nov. 14 Rankings
Nov. 7 Rankings
Oct. 31 Rankings
Oct. 24 Rankings
Oct. 17 Rankings
Oct. 10 Rankings

Final 2015-16 Rankings
Final ’15 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.836
11
0
.561
27
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.819
10
1
.607
1
2-1
1-0
0
3.
Clemson
.791
10
1
.563
25
0-0
3-0
1
4.
Michigan
.786
10
1
.556
34
3-0
1-0
1
5.
Wisconsin
.760
9
2
.586
9
1-2
0-0
0
6.
Penn State
.759
9
2
.585
10
1-1
1-0
1
7.
Nebraska
.752
9
2
.575
19
0-2
1-0
0
8.
Washington
.751
10
1
.507
59
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Colorado
.736
9
2
.556
35
0-1
1-1
0
10.
W. Michigan
.731
11
0
.405
118
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Florida
.727
8
2
.557
33
  Southeastern
.611
41
9
.412
12. Boise State
.723
10
1
.471
85
  Big Ten
.609
32
10
.449
13. Tennessee
.715
8
3
.589
7
  Pac-12
.586
24
10
.460
14. Louisville
.712
9
2
.525
49
  Atlantic Coast
.568
39
13
.415
15. USC
.710
8
3
.583
11
  American Athletic
.521
31
16
.424
16. Florida State
.707
8
3
.579
15
  Big 12
.507
19
11
.427
17. Oklahoma
.706
9
2
.518
54
  Mountain West
.460
25
22
.441
18. Stanford
.696
8
3
.567
24
  Sun Belt
.430
18
26
.484
19. Auburn
.688
8
3
.557
31
  Mid-American
.415
23
25
.427
20. South Florida
.686
9
2
.495
68
  Conference USA
.384
20
31
.447
21. Houston
.685
9
2
.493
70
  *non-conference play
22. Texas A&M
.681
8
3
.549
36
 
23. Navy
.679
8
2
.499
64
 
24. West Virginia
.671
8
2
.490
76
 
25. Minnesota
.670
8
3
.537
43
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Virginia Tech
.667
8
3
.534
45
 
78.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.476
7
4
.395
121
27.
Oklahoma State
.664
9
2
.470
87
 
79.
Mississippi State
.474
4
7
.557
32
28.
Washington State
.654
8
3
.520
52
 
80.
Texas
.468
5
6
.495
67
29.
North Carolina
.651
8
3
.516
55
 
81.
Duke
.459
4
7
.541
41
30.
Arkansas
.641
7
4
.562
26
 
82.
Illinois
.459
3
8
.597
4
31.
Pittsburgh
.640
7
4
.560
28
 
83.
Notre Dame
.445
4
7
.527
48
32.
Georgia
.639
7
4
.560
29
 
84.
Oregon State
.442
3
8
.581
13
33.
LSU
.639
6
4
.582
12
 
85.
Michigan State
.437
3
8
.576
18
34.
Utah
.636
8
3
.500
62
 
86.
Missouri
.433
3
8
.572
20
35.
Tulsa
.628
8
3
.491
72
 
87.
Purdue
.429
3
8
.568
23
36.
Iowa
.624
7
4
.544
39
 
88.
Cincinnati
.421
4
7
.503
61
37.
Wyoming
.616
8
3
.478
81
 
89.
Akron
.418
5
6
.445
99
38.
Georgia Tech
.614
7
4
.534
44
 
90.
Texas Tech
.417
4
7
.499
65
39.
Temple
.612
8
3
.474
84
 
91.
Army
.413
6
5
.387
122
40.
Troy
.612
8
2
.426
103
 
92.
Hawaii
.411
5
7
.460
89
41.
Toledo
.610
9
2
.411
114
 
93.
Rutgers
.407
2
9
.605
2
42.
Miami, Fla.
.604
7
4
.523
50
 
94.
Northern Illinois
.405
4
7
.487
78
43.
Appalachian St.
.596
8
3
.457
90
 
95.
Miami, Ohio
.399
5
6
.426
104
44.
San Diego State
.580
9
2
.381
125
 
96.
North Texas
.396
5
6
.423
106
45.
Mississippi
.573
5
6
.599
3
 
97.
South Alabama
.396
5
5
.396
120
46.
Memphis
.572
7
4
.490
74
 
98.
UTSA
.392
5
6
.418
112
47.
BYU
.572
7
4
.490
75
 
99.
East Carolina
.389
3
8
.527
47
48.
Kentucky
.570
6
5
.543
40
 
100.
UNLV
.387
4
7
.468
88
49.
Northwestern
.567
5
6
.594
5
 
101.
LA Lafayette
.379
4
6
.437
101
50.
Western Kentucky
.563
8
3
.424
105
 
102.
Tulane
.377
3
8
.514
56
51.
Indiana
.563
5
6
.590
6
 
103.
Southern Miss
.374
5
6
.400
119
52.
Air Force
.559
8
3
.420
108
 
104.
Arizona
.373
2
9
.571
21
53.
South Carolina
.557
6
5
.530
46
 
105.
Connecticut
.373
3
8
.510
57
54.
Kansas State
.554
6
4
.494
69
 
106.
Georgia Southern
.370
4
7
.450
96
55.
Maryland
.554
5
6
.580
14
 
107.
LA Monroe
.369
4
7
.449
97
56.
Wake Forest
.545
6
5
.518
53
 
108.
Utah State
.355
3
8
.491
73
57.
Vanderbilt
.531
5
6
.558
30
 
109.
Ball State
.354
4
7
.433
102
58.
Central Florida
.525
6
5
.498
66
 
110.
Iowa State
.353
3
8
.488
77
59.
Louisiana Tech
.520
8
3
.382
124
 
111.
Virginia
.343
2
9
.539
42
60.
N.C. State
.518
5
6
.545
37
 
112.
San Jose State
.341
3
8
.475
82
61.
Arizona State
.517
5
6
.544
38
 
113.
Fla. International
.341
4
7
.418
111
62.
Baylor
.514
6
4
.454
92
 
114.
Bowling Green
.340
3
8
.475
83
63.
Colorado State
.512
6
5
.485
79
 
115.
New Mexico State
.339
3
7
.456
91
64.
Idaho
.508
6
4
.448
98
 
116.
Kent State
.337
3
8
.471
86
65.
Oregon
.505
4
7
.587
8
 
117.
Nevada
.328
4
7
.405
116
66.
Old Dominion
.504
8
3
.368
127
 
118.
Charlotte
.328
4
7
.405
117
67.
TCU
.500
5
5
.500
63
 
119.
Kansas
.315
2
9
.507
60
68.
New Mexico
.499
7
4
.417
113
 
120.
Georgia State
.313
3
8
.444
100
69.
UCLA
.497
4
7
.579
16
 
121.
Massachusetts
.303
2
9
.493
71
70.
California
.495
4
7
.577
17
 
122.
Marshall
.291
3
8
.418
110
71.
Boston College
.495
5
6
.522
51
 
123.
Texas State
.278
2
8
.451
93
72.
Ohio
.489
7
4
.407
115
 
124.
Florida Atlantic
.262
3
8
.383
123
73.
Syracuse
.488
4
7
.570
22
 
125.
Rice
.258
3
8
.378
126
74.
SMU
.483
5
6
.510
58
 
126.
UTEP
.247
3
8
.365
128
75.
Arkansas State
.480
6
4
.420
107
 
127.
Buffalo
.244
2
9
.419
109
76.
Eastern Michigan
.478
6
5
.450
94
 
128.
Fresno State
.240
1
10
.481
80
77.
Central Michigan
.477
6
5
.450
95
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2016 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved