Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Alabama Moves to #1

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

  • #1 will play #2 this week, with Alabama hosting Texas A&M
  • None of the teams in the current top-10 have yet played each other—all of them are undefeated
  • #11 Tennessee’s schedule was already the nation’s toughest, and then the Vols played Alabama on Saturday
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 17

Oct. 10 Rankings
Final 2014-15 Rankings

Final 2015-16 Rankings
Final ’15 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.854
7
0
.594
6
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Texas A&M
.841
6
0
.570
14
0-0
2-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.837
6
0
.562
20
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Clemson
.827
7
0
.544
29
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Michigan
.815
6
0
.524
39
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Nebraska
.809
6
0
.513
48
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Washington
.779
6
0
.469
80
0-0
1-0
0
8.
West Virginia
.778
5
0
.466
84
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Boise State
.776
6
0
.464
85
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Western Mich.
.769
7
0
.455
90
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Tennessee
.764
5
2
.656
1
  Southeastern
.635
29
8
.461
12. Louisville
.738
5
1
.547
26
  Big Ten
.605
32
10
.444
13. Florida
.719
5
1
.522
42
  Pac-12
.597
24
10
.472
14. Florida State
.714
5
2
.596
5
  Atlantic Coast
.594
36
10
.420
15. Houston
.711
6
1
.496
57
  American Athletic
.522
29
14
.416
16. Utah
.692
6
1
.474
73
  Big 12
.504
19
11
.424
17. South Florida
.684
6
1
.464
86
  Mountain West
.442
22
22
.442
18. Baylor
.684
6
0
.351
125
  Sun Belt
.439
15
22
.496
19. Penn State
.683
4
2
.589
8
  Mid-American
.418
23
25
.430
20. Wisconsin
.677
4
2
.583
9
  Conference USA
.367
16
30
.457
21. Stanford
.676
4
2
.581
10
  *non-conference play
22. North Carolina
.675
5
2
.551
25
 
23. Arkansas
.671
5
2
.547
27
 
24. Colorado
.669
5
2
.544
28
 
25. Navy
.666
4
1
.484
66
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Auburn
.666
4
2
.571
13
 
78.
Tulane
.468
3
3
.468
82
27.
Troy
.662
5
1
.456
89
 
79.
Western Kentucky
.468
4
3
.426
106
28.
Oklahoma
.653
4
2
.557
21
 
80.
South Carolina
.466
2
4
.567
16
29.
Wake Forest
.648
5
2
.521
43
 
81.
Oregon
.464
2
4
.565
17
30.
USC
.645
4
3
.604
3
 
82.
Missouri
.464
2
4
.565
18
31.
Pittsburgh
.640
5
2
.512
50
 
83.
Rutgers
.460
2
5
.590
7
32.
Washington State
.634
4
2
.536
33
 
84.
Ohio
.452
4
3
.410
112
33.
Memphis
.633
5
1
.425
107
 
85.
Southern Miss
.452
4
3
.410
113
34.
Arizona State
.632
5
2
.504
54
 
86.
Louisiana Tech
.451
4
3
.409
114
35.
Virginia Tech
.621
4
2
.523
41
 
87.
Georgia Southern
.450
3
3
.450
95
36.
Appalachian St.
.616
4
2
.517
46
 
88.
Purdue
.446
3
3
.446
96
37.
Toledo
.615
5
1
.406
118
 
89.
New Mexico
.443
3
3
.443
97
38.
Minnesota
.612
4
2
.513
49
 
90.
Duke
.438
3
4
.480
69
39.
Miami, Fla.
.608
4
2
.509
52
 
91.
Arizona
.424
2
5
.555
24
40.
Mississippi
.607
3
3
.607
2
 
92.
Michigan State
.422
2
4
.523
40
41.
N.C. State
.606
4
2
.507
53
 
93.
Mississippi State
.417
2
4
.518
45
42.
Georgia
.597
4
3
.555
23
 
94.
Army
.414
4
2
.321
128
43.
LSU
.594
4
2
.494
59
 
95.
East Carolina
.414
2
4
.514
47
44.
San Diego State
.589
5
1
.380
123
 
96.
UNLV
.411
3
4
.453
93
45.
Maryland
.587
4
2
.486
62
 
97.
Ball State
.410
4
3
.369
124
46.
Wyoming
.585
4
2
.484
65
 
98.
UTSA
.407
3
3
.407
116
47.
BYU
.584
4
3
.542
30
 
99.
Hawaii
.398
3
4
.440
101
48.
Georgia Tech
.581
4
3
.539
31
 
100.
Utah State
.398
2
4
.498
56
49.
Central Michigan
.574
5
2
.443
99
 
101.
North Texas
.396
3
3
.396
120
50.
Oklahoma State
.573
4
2
.472
77
 
102.
South Alabama
.395
3
3
.395
121
51.
Tulsa
.569
4
2
.468
83
 
103.
Virginia
.386
2
4
.486
63
52.
Indiana
.567
3
3
.567
15
 
104.
LA Monroe
.384
2
4
.483
67
53.
Kentucky
.564
3
3
.564
19
 
105.
SMU
.376
2
4
.475
72
54.
Eastern Michigan
.559
5
2
.428
104
 
106.
LA Lafayette
.371
2
4
.470
79
55.
Iowa
.557
5
2
.426
105
 
107.
New Mexico State
.370
2
4
.468
81
56.
UCLA
.554
3
4
.596
4
 
108.
Fla. International
.365
3
4
.406
117
57.
TCU
.542
4
2
.441
100
 
109.
Notre Dame
.360
2
5
.488
60
58.
Air Force
.539
4
2
.438
103
 
110.
Texas State
.357
2
4
.454
92
59.
Northwestern
.533
3
3
.533
35
 
111.
Arkansas State
.354
2
4
.451
94
60.
California
.531
3
3
.531
36
 
112.
Marshall
.347
2
4
.443
98
61.
Idaho
.518
4
3
.475
71
 
113.
Georgia State
.327
1
5
.531
37
62.
Vanderbilt
.513
3
4
.556
22
 
114.
Charlotte
.317
2
5
.440
102
63.
Old Dominion
.508
4
2
.408
115
 
115.
Northern Illinois
.314
1
6
.533
34
64.
Temple
.502
4
3
.459
88
 
116.
Nevada
.308
3
4
.346
127
65.
Kansas State
.502
3
3
.502
55
 
117.
Bowling Green
.307
1
6
.525
38
66.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.499
4
2
.399
119
 
118.
Kent State
.303
2
5
.424
108
67.
Akron
.497
4
3
.454
91
 
119.
San Jose State
.296
2
5
.415
110
68.
Central Florida
.496
3
3
.496
58
 
120.
Kansas
.285
1
5
.482
68
69.
Syracuse
.494
3
4
.537
32
 
121.
Fresno State
.275
1
6
.487
61
70.
Texas Tech
.478
3
3
.478
70
 
122.
Massachusetts
.273
1
6
.485
64
71.
Connecticut
.477
3
4
.520
44
 
123.
Iowa State
.264
1
6
.473
75
72.
Oregon State
.477
2
4
.577
11
 
124.
UTEP
.230
1
5
.411
111
73.
Illinois
.474
2
4
.575
12
 
125.
Miami, Ohio
.226
1
6
.422
109
74.
Texas
.473
3
3
.473
74
 
126.
Florida Atlantic
.204
1
6
.391
122
75.
Cincinnati
.473
3
3
.473
76
 
127.
Buffalo
.187
1
5
.349
126
76.
Boston College
.471
3
3
.471
78
 
128.
Rice
.175
0
6
.459
87
77.
Colorado State
.469
3
4
.512
51
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2016 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved