Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

In 1st Post-Pac-12 Year, Oregon Premiers at #1

  • The Ducks have been the clear #1 team to date, having gone 11-0 with a win over #3 Ohio State
  • Indiana achieves the #2 spot, having posted a 10-0 record versus an essentially average schedule
  • UCLA, Michigan, Florida State, and Georgia have played the 4-toughest schedules to date
  • SMU, at long last, is back in the top-10
  • Undefeated (9-0) Army cracks the top-25 (at #21), despite having played the 2nd-easiest schedule to date
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 20

Final 2023-24 Rankings
Jan. 3, 2024 Rankings
Final 23 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oregon
.825
11
0
.540
50
1-0
2-0
0
2.
Indiana
.803
10
0
.504
70
0-0
0-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.794
9
1
.576
23
1-1
0-0
0
4.
Georgia
.781
8
2
.626
4
1-1
2-1
0
5.
Texas
.775
9
1
.548
42
0-1
0-0
0
6.
Penn State
.774
9
1
.546
46
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Notre Dame
.768
9
1
.538
51
0-0
1-0
1
8.
SMU
.763
9
1
.530
59
0-1
0-0
0
9.
Alabama
.756
8
2
.594
14
1-0
2-1
1
10.
BYU
.756
9
1
.521
65
1-0
1-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Miami, Fla.
.750
9
1
.513
68
  Southeastern
.639
48
8
.414
12.
Clemson
.739
8
2
.572
26
  Big Ten
.612
42
10
.420
13.
Mississippi
.724
8
2
.552
39
  Atlantic Coast
.597
43
17
.465
14.
South Carolina
.721
7
3
.613
6
  Big 12
.585
33
11
.431
15.
Texas A&M
.719
8
2
.546
48
  Sun Belt
.467
28
27
.462
16.
Iowa State
.712
8
2
.537
52
  American Athletic
.433
27
26
.428
17.
Colorado
.712
8
2
.537
53
  Mid-American
.429
20
28
.478
18.
Boise State
.711
9
1
.463
86
  Mountain West
.416
25
32
.452
19.
Tennessee
.706
8
2
.530
58
  Conference USA
.351
13
24
.437
20.
Arizona State
.696
8
2
.519
66
  *non-conference play        
21.
Army
.695
9
0
.362
133
   
22.
Kansas State
.674
7
3
.559
36
 
23.
Tulane
.668
9
2
.474
80
 
24.
Illinois
.668
7
3
.552
38
 
25.
LSU
.667
6
4
.611
8
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Missouri
.663
7
3
.547
44
 
81.
Arizona
.489
4
6
.549
41
27.
Pittsburgh
.653
7
3
.535
55
 
82.
Miami, Ohio
.489
6
4
.429
108
28.
Syracuse
.650
7
3
.532
57
 
83.
Wake Forest
.487
4
6
.547
43
29.
Michigan
.649
5
5
.649
2
 
84.
South Florida
.485
5
5
.485
78
30.
Louisville
.647
6
4
.590
16
 
85.
Northern Illinois
.485
6
4
.425
112
31.
Duke
.646
7
3
.527
63
 
86.
Stanford
.480
3
7
.601
11
32.
UNLV
.632
8
2
.447
98
 
87.
Liberty
.477
7
2
.314
134
33.
Iowa
.623
6
4
.565
32
 
88.
Buffalo
.476
6
4
.417
115
34.
Georgia Tech
.622
6
4
.564
33
 
89.
Auburn
.475
4
6
.535
54
35.
Texas Tech
.620
6
4
.561
34
 
90.
Utah
.473
4
6
.534
56
36.
Florida
.617
5
5
.617
5
 
91.
South Alabama
.472
5
5
.472
81
37.
Minnesota
.615
6
4
.556
37
 
92.
San Jose State
.463
6
4
.404
122
38.
Washington
.613
6
5
.587
19
 
93.
Coastal Carolina
.461
5
5
.461
88
39.
Memphis
.611
9
2
.412
118
 
94.
North Texas
.460
5
5
.460
90
40.
Louisiana 
.611
8
2
.425
113
 
95.
LA Monroe
.459
5
5
.459
91
41.
USC
.611
5
5
.611
9
 
96.
East Carolina
.457
6
4
.398
125
42.
Vanderbilt
.611
6
4
.552
40
 
97.
Old Dominion
.451
4
6
.511
69
43.
Baylor
.605
6
4
.546
45
 
98.
Appalachian St.
.439
4
5
.472
83
44.
Rutgers
.602
6
4
.543
49
 
99.
Western Michigan
.437
5
5
.437
102
45.
Virginia Tech
.599
5
5
.599
12
 
100.
Fresno State
.428
5
5
.428
110
46.
UCLA
.599
4
6
.655
1
 
101.
UTSA
.428
5
5
.428
111
47.
Washington State
.598
8
2
.412
119
 
102.
Oklahoma State
.424
3
7
.546
47
48.
Oklahoma
.593
5
5
.593
15
 
103.
Charlotte
.407
3
7
.529
60
49.
James Madison
.590
8
2
.404
121
 
104.
Mississippi State
.402
2
8
.588
17
50.
TCU
.587
6
4
.528
61
 
105.
Oregon State
.401
4
6
.460
89
51.
North Carolina
.587
6
4
.528
62
 
106.
Rice
.394
3
7
.514
67
52.
Navy
.583
7
3
.462
87
 
107.
Florida State
.393
1
9
.649
3
53.
Wisconsin
.580
5
5
.580
21
 
108.
Eastern Michigan
.386
5
5
.386
129
54.
Cincinnati
.574
5
5
.574
24
 
109.
Temple
.371
3
7
.490
76
55.
Marshall
.573
7
3
.451
94
 
110.
Hawaii
.370
4
7
.450
95
56.
West Virginia
.572
5
5
.572
27
 
111.
New Mexico
.369
5
6
.395
128
57.
Virginia
.570
5
5
.570
28
 
112.
Purdue
.356
1
9
.612
7
58.
Nebraska
.569
5
5
.569
29
 
113.
Troy
.351
3
7
.469
84
59.
Boston College
.566
5
5
.566
31
 
114.
Nevada
.350
3
8
.485
79
60.
Sam Houston St.
.563
8
2
.377
131
 
115.
Utah State
.348
3
7
.465
85
61.
Arkansas
.560
5
5
.560
35
 
116.
Air Force
.333
3
7
.449
96
62.
Michigan State
.545
4
6
.604
10
 
117.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.329
3
7
.445
99
63.
Connecticut
.544
7
3
.422
114
 
118.
Ball State
.327
3
7
.442
101
64.
Kansas
.538
4
6
.598
13
 
119.
Louisiana Tech
.325
4
6
.380
130
65.
Colorado State
.538
7
3
.416
116
 
120.
UAB
.322
2
8
.502
71
66.
Georgia Southern
.532
6
4
.472
82
 
121.
Akron
.320
2
8
.500
72
67.
Maryland
.529
4
6
.588
18
 
122.
Tulsa
.317
3
7
.431
106
68.
UCF
.527
4
6
.586
20
 
123.
Georgia State
.317
2
8
.497
73
69.
N.C. State
.525
5
5
.525
64
 
124.
San Diego State
.317
3
7
.431
107
70.
Western Kentucky
.525
7
3
.404
123
 
125.
Central Michigan
.302
3
7
.414
117
71.
Ohio
.519
7
3
.398
124
 
126.
Fla. International
.287
3
7
.396
126
72.
Northwestern
.517
4
6
.577
22
 
127.
Florida Atlantic
.282
2
8
.455
92
73.
Toledo
.516
7
3
.396
127
 
128.
Wyoming
.277
2
8
.449
97
74.
Houston
.514
4
6
.574
25
 
129.
New Mexico St.
.267
2
8
.436
104
75.
Texas State
.513
6
4
.453
93
 
130.
Massachusetts
.261
2
8
.429
109
76.
Kentucky
.509
4
6
.569
30
 
131.
Southern Miss
.251
1
9
.488
77
77.
Arkansas State
.505
6
4
.445
100
 
132.
UTEP
.244
2
8
.407
120
78.
California
.495
5
5
.495
74
 
133.
Kennesaw St.
.214
1
9
.436
103
79.
Jacksonville St.
.494
7
3
.374
132
 
134.
Kent State
.194
0
10
.491
75
80.
Bowling Green
.492
6
4
.432
105
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s tenth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2024 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved