Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Oregon Remains #1

  • The undefeated Ducks have a nation-leading 4 wins over the current top-25
  • There are large gaps between #1 and #2 (.025), #2 and #3 (.027), and #9 and #10 (.027), while the 7 teams ranked between #3 and #9 are separated by just .021
  • The SEC leads all conferences with 9 teams in the top-25
  • Michigan cracks the top-25 (at #25) despite 5 losses, as the Wolverines have posted a winning record versus the nation’s 2nd-toughest schedule to date
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 25

Nov. 20 Rankings
Final 2023-24 Rankings
Jan. 3, 2024 Rankings
Final 23 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2022-23 Rankings
Final ’22 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oregon
.833
11
0
.556
43
2-0
2-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.808
10
1
.589
17
2-1
0-0
0
3.
Penn State
.781
10
1
.549
44
0-1
1-0
0
4.
Texas
.779
10
1
.546
48
0-1
1-0
0
5.
SMU
.774
10
1
.539
53
0-0
1-1
0
6.
Notre Dame
.773
10
1
.538
54
0-0
2-0
1
7.
Indiana
.773
10
1
.537
56
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Miami, Fla.
.765
10
1
.527
65
0-0
1-0
1
9.
Georgia
.760
9
2
.586
19
1-0
2-2
0
10.
Boise State
.733
10
1
.483
76
0-1
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Alabama
.724
8
3
.600
12
  Southeastern
.634
52
8
.403
12.
Iowa State
.722
9
2
.537
55
  Big Ten
.614
42
10
.422
13.
Clemson
.721
9
2
.536
58
  Atlantic Coast
.599
46
17
.459
14.
Arizona State
.716
9
2
.530
63
  Big 12
.585
33
11
.431
15.
BYU
.714
9
2
.527
64
  Sun Belt
.467
28
27
.462
16.
South Carolina
.701
8
3
.572
28
  American Athletic
.433
27
27
.433
17.
Tennessee
.696
9
2
.506
68
  Mid-American
.428
20
28
.477
18.
Illinois
.695
8
3
.566
34
  Mountain West
.424
25
32
.461
19.
Mississippi
.694
8
3
.564
35
  Conference USA
.345
13
26
.441
20.
Kansas State
.688
8
3
.557
38
  *non-conference play        
21.
Texas A&M
.685
8
3
.555
40
   
22.
LSU
.681
7
4
.606
9
 
23.
Louisville
.678
7
4
.602
11
 
24.
Missouri
.674
8
3
.541
50
 
25.
Michigan
.670
6
5
.645
2
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Colorado
.669
8
3
.536
57
 
81.
Bowling Green
.490
7
4
.409
119
27.
Tulane
.669
9
2
.475
80
 
82.
South Alabama
.489
6
5
.462
89
28.
Syracuse
.668
8
3
.535
59
 
83.
Western Kentucky
.488
7
4
.406
121
29.
Duke
.665
8
3
.531
61
 
84.
Buffalo
.485
7
4
.404
124
30.
UNLV
.655
9
2
.459
91
 
85.
Toledo
.485
7
4
.403
125
31.
Army
.651
9
1
.396
129
 
86.
East Carolina
.482
7
4
.400
126
32.
Georgia Tech
.648
7
4
.570
29
 
87.
Appalachian St.
.478
5
5
.478
77
33.
Florida
.647
6
5
.622
4
 
88.
Wake Forest
.474
4
7
.557
39
34.
Iowa
.639
7
4
.560
36
 
89.
Texas State
.469
6
5
.442
100
35.
USC
.638
6
5
.612
7
 
90.
Utah
.465
4
7
.547
46
36.
Oklahoma
.631
6
5
.606
10
 
91.
Fresno State
.463
6
5
.436
104
37.
Texas Tech
.628
7
4
.548
45
 
92.
Arizona
.462
4
7
.544
49
38.
Pittsburgh
.627
7
4
.547
47
 
93.
Stanford
.459
3
8
.598
14
39.
Baylor
.620
7
4
.540
52
 
94.
San Jose State
.457
6
5
.430
108
40.
Louisiana 
.617
9
2
.419
115
 
95.
Northern Illinois
.451
6
5
.424
110
41.
Washington
.610
6
5
.583
21
 
96.
UTSA
.440
6
5
.414
117
42.
Memphis
.608
9
2
.409
118
 
97.
Coastal Carolina
.440
5
6
.467
83
43.
TCU
.603
7
4
.522
66
 
98.
Oregon State
.440
5
6
.467
84
44.
Minnesota
.602
6
5
.575
27
 
99.
LA Monroe
.436
5
6
.463
88
45.
West Virginia
.596
6
5
.569
30
 
100.
Old Dominion
.430
4
7
.512
67
46.
Boston College
.595
6
5
.569
31
 
101.
North Texas
.429
5
6
.456
93
47.
Vanderbilt
.594
6
5
.567
32
 
102.
Oklahoma State
.420
3
8
.559
37
48.
Nebraska
.594
6
5
.567
33
 
103.
Florida State
.419
2
9
.617
5
49.
Marshall
.590
8
3
.451
94
 
104.
Charlotte
.416
4
7
.498
70
50.
Kansas
.587
5
6
.613
6
 
105.
Mississippi State
.400
2
9
.598
13
51.
Washington State
.585
8
3
.446
97
 
106.
Western Michigan
.394
5
6
.420
114
52.
Navy
.585
7
3
.464
86
 
107.
New Mexico
.373
5
6
.399
127
53.
Virginia Tech
.582
5
6
.608
8
 
108.
Eastern Michigan
.373
5
6
.399
128
54.
Rutgers
.580
6
5
.553
42
 
109.
Utah State
.369
4
7
.449
95
55.
UCLA
.578
4
7
.656
1
 
110.
Hawaii
.365
4
7
.444
99
56.
Arkansas
.568
6
5
.541
51
 
111.
Air Force
.362
4
7
.441
101
57.
Michigan State
.563
5
6
.589
16
 
112.
Georgia State
.361
3
8
.497
71
58.
North Carolina
.557
6
5
.530
62
 
113.
Purdue
.360
1
10
.622
3
59.
Virginia
.556
5
6
.583
23
 
114.
Rice
.360
3
8
.496
72
60.
Cincinnati
.553
5
6
.580
25
 
115.
Temple
.353
3
8
.488
73
61.
Wisconsin
.551
5
6
.578
26
 
116.
UAB
.352
3
8
.487
74
62.
Ohio
.547
8
3
.408
120
 
117.
Troy
.342
3
8
.476
79
63.
James Madison
.545
8
3
.406
122
 
118.
Akron
.331
3
8
.464
87
64.
Georgia Southern
.544
7
4
.461
90
 
119.
Nevada
.330
3
9
.478
78
65.
California
.529
6
5
.502
69
 
120.
Central Michigan
.328
4
7
.405
123
66.
Arkansas State
.527
7
4
.445
98
 
121.
Louisiana Tech
.312
4
7
.387
130
67.
Auburn
.527
5
6
.554
41
 
122.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.306
3
8
.436
103
68.
Connecticut
.522
7
4
.440
102
 
123.
Ball State
.305
3
8
.435
105
69.
Jacksonville St.
.520
8
3
.382
132
 
124.
San Diego State
.305
3
8
.434
106
70.
Liberty
.516
8
2
.334
134
 
125.
Tulsa
.305
3
8
.434
107
71.
Kentucky
.511
4
7
.593
15
 
126.
New Mexico St.
.293
3
8
.421
112
72.
Sam Houston St.
.510
8
3
.373
133
 
127.
Wyoming
.280
2
9
.465
85
73.
Maryland
.507
4
7
.589
18
 
128.
Massachusetts
.274
2
9
.457
92
74.
Miami, Ohio
.506
7
4
.424
109
 
129.
Florida Atlantic
.265
2
9
.447
96
75.
N.C. State
.504
5
6
.531
60
 
130.
Fla. International
.262
3
8
.383
131
76.
Northwestern
.503
4
7
.585
20
 
131.
UTEP
.247
2
9
.423
111
77.
Colorado State
.503
7
4
.421
113
 
132.
Southern Miss
.243
1
10
.485
75
78.
Houston
.502
4
7
.583
22
 
133.
Kennesaw St.
.242
2
9
.417
116
79.
UCF
.500
4
7
.582
24
 
134.
Kent State
.181
0
11
.469
81
80.
South Florida
.496
6
5
.469
82
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s tenth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2024 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved