Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Indiana Hoosiers Are #1

  • Rose Bowl-bound Indiana heads into the playoff and bowls as the nation’s only undefeated team
  • Texas Tech jumps from #8 to #3, and Georgia from #7 to #4
  • Notre Dame, which would have made the playoff field under the BCS selection process, finishes the regular season at #10—ahead of #11 Alabama, and well ahead of #17 Miami (which lost to #40 Louisville and #41 SMU)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 7

Nov. 30 Rankings
Nov. 24 Rankings
Nov. 17 Rankings

Final 2024-25 Rankings Final24 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2023-24 Rankings
Jan. 3, 2024 Rankings
Final 23 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched.
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Indiana .842 13 0 .571 27 2-0 1-0 0
2.
Ohio State .814 12 1 .588 13 0-1 3-0 0
3.
Texas Tech .806 12 1 .575 23 2-0 1-1 0
4.
Georgia .799 12 1 .564 33 1-0 2-1 0
5.
Mississippi .796 11 1 .566 31 1-1 1-0 0
6.
Oregon .793 11 1 .560 36 0-1 1-0 0
7.
Texas A&M .792 11 1 .560 37 1-0 0-1 0
8.
BYU .775 11 2 .587 14 0-2 2-0 0
9.
Oklahoma .767 10 2 .585 16 0-1 2-1 0
10.
Notre Dame .750 10 2 .563 34 0-1 2-1 0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Alabama .744 10 3 .598 9   Southeastern .642 56 8 .404
12.
Utah .739 10 2 .548 49   Big Ten .611 44 10 .415
13.
USC .739 9 3 .603 8   Big 12 .584 37 9 .395
14.
Michigan .734 9 3 .598 10   Atlantic Coast .550 41 25 .477
15.
Vanderbilt .733 10 2 .540 55   American Athletic .516 34 20 .438
16.
Tulane .729 11 2 .526 61   Mountain West .453 26 22 .428
17.
Miami, Fla. .723 10 2 .528 59   Sun Belt .438 27 29 .448
18.
Texas .714 9 3 .573 25   Conference USA .386 19 29 .447
19.
North Texas .698 11 2 .489 82   Mid-American .352 16 36 .465
20.
Arizona .694 9 3 .549 47   *non-conference play        
21.
Navy .691 9 2 .500 76    
22.
James Madison .685 12 1 .415 110  
23.
Illinois .677 8 4 .583 18  
24.
Arizona State .670 8 4 .575 24  
25.
South Florida .667 9 3 .519 62  
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. Iowa .664 8 4 .568 30  
82.
Toledo .478 8 4 .379 132
27. Houston .663 9 3 .514 63  
83.
Michigan State .472 4 8 .573 26
28. Virginia .661 10 3 .500 77  
84.
Temple .463 5 7 .513 64
29. Georgia Tech .656 9 3 .507 70  
85.
Rice .462 5 7 .512 66
30. TCU .653 8 4 .556 38  
86.
Missouri St. .458 7 5 .409 113
31. Iowa State .651 8 4 .555 40  
87.
Colorado .458 3 9 .611 6
32. Washington .651 8 4 .554 41  
88.
Fla. International .457 7 5 .408 114
33. Tennessee .647 8 4 .549 46  
89.
Jacksonville St. .455 8 5 .387 127
34. Missouri .639 8 4 .542 54  
90.
Stanford .454 4 8 .555 39
35. LSU .638 7 5 .591 11  
91.
Southern Miss .451 7 5 .402 118
36. Duke .616 8 5 .549 48  
92.
Georgia Southern .451 6 6 .451 93
37. Pittsburgh .608 8 4 .508 68  
93.
Maryland .450 4 8 .552 44
38. New Mexico .606 9 3 .453 92  
94.
Louisiana Tech .444 7 5 .396 123
39. Boise State .606 9 4 .490 81  
95.
Florida Atlantic .443 4 8 .544 53
40. Louisville .605 8 4 .505 72  
96.
Coastal Carolina .439 6 6 .439 98
41. SMU .601 8 4 .502 75  
97.
Miami, Ohio .430 7 6 .408 116
42. N.C. State .601 7 5 .552 43  
98.
Texas State .427 6 6 .427 101
43. Minnesota .600 7 5 .551 45  
99.
Central Michigan .423 7 5 .375 133
44. UNLV .600 10 3 .434 99  
100.
Arkansas State .423 6 6 .423 105
45. Nebraska .597 7 5 .547 50  
101.
Louisiana  .421 6 6 .421 107
46. Cincinnati .594 7 5 .545 52  
102.
Virginia Tech .416 3 9 .569 28
47. Wake Forest .591 8 4 .491 80  
103.
Purdue .416 2 10 .624 4
48. Northwestern .584 6 6 .584 17  
104.
UAB .410 4 8 .511 67
49. Memphis .583 8 4 .483 85  
105.
North Carolina .402 4 8 .502 74
50. East Carolina .581 8 4 .480 86  
106.
Arkansas .402 2 10 .610 7
51. Old Dominion .579 9 3 .425 103  
107.
Syracuse .394 3 9 .547 51
52. San Diego State .577 9 3 .423 104  
108.
Marshall .391 5 7 .440 97
53. Penn State .576 6 6 .576 22  
109.
Delaware .382 6 6 .382 129
54. Kennesaw St. .576 10 3 .410 112  
110.
Air Force .380 4 8 .479 87
55. Connecticut .555 9 3 .401 119  
111.
Tulsa .371 4 8 .469 89
56. Kansas State .552 6 6 .552 42  
112.
Appalachian St. .371 5 7 .419 109
57. Wisconsin .548 4 8 .645 1  
113.
South Alabama .349 4 8 .445 94
58. Clemson .548 7 5 .498 79  
114.
Kent State .347 5 7 .394 125
59. Mississippi State .537 5 7 .586 15  
115.
Wyoming .345 4 8 .441 96
60. Florida .535 4 8 .633 3  
116.
Buffalo .326 5 7 .371 135
61. California .535 7 5 .485 84  
117.
Boston College .324 2 10 .528 60
62. Hawaii .532 8 4 .431 100  
118.
San Jose State .320 3 9 .467 90
63. Auburn .530 5 7 .579 19  
119.
Liberty .319 4 8 .412 111
64. Kentucky .529 5 7 .579 20  
120.
Nevada .318 3 9 .464 91
65. Fresno State .523 8 4 .422 106  
121.
Akron .312 5 7 .357 136
66. Rutgers .519 5 7 .569 29  
122.
Oklahoma State .312 1 11 .577 21
67. Western Michigan .517 9 4 .401 120  
123.
Oregon State .305 2 10 .506 71
68. Baylor .516 5 7 .566 32  
124.
New Mexico St. .304 4 8 .396 122
69. South Carolina .513 4 8 .613 5  
125.
Colorado State .303 2 10 .504 73
70. UTSA .512 6 6 .512 65  
126.
Ball State .303 4 8 .394 124
71. Kansas .512 5 7 .562 35  
127.
LA Monroe .298 3 9 .441 95
72. Washington State .507 6 6 .507 69  
128.
Eastern Michigan .289 4 8 .379 131
73. Army .504 6 5 .477 88  
129.
Bowling Green .283 4 8 .372 134
74. UCLA .492 3 9 .643 2  
130.
Charlotte .277 1 11 .535 57
75. Troy .490 8 5 .421 108  
131.
Mid. Tenn. St. .264 3 9 .399 121
76. West Virginia .489 4 8 .589 12  
132.
Northern Illinois .258 3 9 .393 126
77. Utah State .487 6 6 .487 83  
133.
Georgia State .249 1 11 .499 78
78. Florida State .485 5 7 .535 56  
134.
Sam Houston St. .241 2 10 .425 102
79. Western Kentucky .482 8 4 .383 128  
135.
UTEP .225 2 10 .405 117
80. UCF .481 5 7 .531 58  
136.
Massachusetts .147 0 12 .408 115
81. Ohio .479 8 4 .380 130  
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s twelfth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2025 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved