Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Three Big Ten Teams Finish in the Top-4

  • While national champion (14-2) Ohio State had a much stronger finish, Big Ten champion (13-1) Oregon had the better overall, season-long results
  • The Ducks and Buckeyes each played the other twice and #12 Michigan once, with 1 of those games at home, 1 on the road, and 1 at a neutral site—and the Ducks went 2-1 in those games while the Buckeyes went 1-2 (with neither team losing otherwise)
  • Versus the season-ending top-12, Oregon went 5-1 and Ohio State 5-2 (with neither team losing to a team ranked outside the top-12)
  • The #3 Fighting Irish went 3-1 versus the season-ending top-10
  • The #4 Nittany Lions’ only losses were to the 3 teams ranked above them
  • Half of the top-10 is made up of teams from the Big Ten, this season’s #1 conference
  • Five teams in a row—#14 to #18—are from the SEC
  • Army and Navy both crack the season-ending top-25—in consecutive spots
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, 2024-25

Dec. 8 Rankings
Dec. 2 Rankings
Nov. 25 Rankings
Nov. 20 Rankings

Final 2023-24 Rankings
Jan. 3, 2024 Rankings
Final 23 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oregon
.823
13
1
.599
6
4-1
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.816
14
2
.627
2
5-1
1-1
0
3.
Notre Dame
.787
14
2
.583
19
3-1
2-0
1
4.
Penn State
.759
13
3
.589
13
2-3
1-0
0
5.
Texas
.756
13
3
.585
17
0-3
2-0
0
6.
Georgia
.747
11
3
.591
11
2-1
1-2
0
7.
Indiana
.747
11
2
.550
37
0-2
1-0
0
8.
BYU
.727
11
2
.524
56
0-0
1-1
1
9.
Illinois
.719
10
3
.566
27
0-2
2-0
1
10.
Boise State
.713
12
2
.499
66
0-2
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Iowa State
.710
11
3
.544
41
  Big Ten
.643
53
16
.480
12.
Michigan
.709
8
5
.649
1
  Southeastern
.638
63
16
.455
13.
Arizona State
.708
11
3
.543
43
  Big 12
.573
36
15
.447
14.
LSU
.696
9
4
.589
14
  Atlantic Coast
.553
49
32
.490
15.
Alabama
.693
9
4
.585
18
  Sun Belt
.465
32
30
.455
16.
Mississippi
.689
10
3
.532
50
  American Athletic
.451
33
29
.432
17.
Missouri
.689
10
3
.531
51
  Mid-American
.441
25
30
.468
18.
South Carolina
.687
9
4
.578
21
  Mountain West
.416
29
37
.452
19.
SMU
.686
11
3
.517
58
  Conference USA
.342
14
30
.447
20.
Tennessee
.675
10
3
.515
59
  *non-conference play        
21.
Miami, Fla.
.670
10
3
.509
63
   
22.
Syracuse
.668
10
3
.507
65
 
23.
Army
.663
12
2
.440
101
 
24.
Navy
.657
10
3
.495
69
 
25.
Kansas State
.656
9
4
.544
42
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Clemson
.655
10
4
.529
54
 
81.
Utah
.477
5
7
.528
55
27.
Louisville
.653
9
4
.540
46
 
82.
Houston
.474
4
8
.575
22
28.
Memphis
.653
11
2
.437
104
 
83.
N.C. State
.469
6
7
.492
73
29.
USC
.640
7
6
.618
5
 
84.
UTSA
.467
7
6
.444
99
30.
Florida
.640
8
5
.573
25
 
85.
North Carolina
.463
6
7
.486
76
31.
Colorado
.634
9
4
.519
57
 
86.
Old Dominion
.459
5
7
.509
64
32.
Texas A&M
.632
8
5
.565
29
 
87.
UCF
.458
4
8
.559
32
33.
Iowa
.631
8
5
.564
30
 
88.
Liberty
.457
8
4
.360
134
34.
Minnesota
.629
8
5
.562
31
 
89.
Bowling Green
.457
7
6
.434
108
35.
UNLV
.626
11
3
.450
95
 
90.
Western Kentucky
.455
8
6
.413
121
36.
Marshall
.624
10
3
.459
89
 
91.
California
.454
6
7
.477
80
37.
TCU
.610
9
4
.494
70
 
92.
Appalachian St.
.454
5
6
.481
77
38.
Baylor
.608
8
5
.540
45
 
93.
Charlotte
.442
5
7
.492
74
39.
Duke
.608
9
4
.492
72
 
94.
San Jose State
.440
7
6
.418
118
40.
Ohio
.600
11
3
.423
114
 
95.
North Texas
.439
6
7
.462
86
41.
Texas Tech
.598
8
5
.529
52
 
96.
Arizona
.433
4
8
.534
49
42.
Tulane
.595
9
5
.510
62
 
97.
Coastal Carolina
.430
6
7
.453
93
43.
Nebraska
.588
7
6
.565
28
 
98.
LA Monroe
.421
5
7
.470
84
44.
Vanderbilt
.580
7
6
.557
33
 
99.
Fresno State
.415
6
7
.438
103
45.
UCLA
.579
5
7
.627
3
 
100.
Wake Forest
.413
4
8
.513
60
46.
Rutgers
.576
7
6
.554
34
 
101.
Oregon State
.412
5
7
.462
87
47.
Oklahoma
.574
6
7
.596
8
 
102.
Western Michigan
.411
6
7
.434
107
48.
Washington
.572
6
7
.594
9
 
103.
Rice
.411
4
8
.511
61
49.
Georgia Tech
.570
7
6
.547
40
 
104.
Oklahoma State
.397
3
9
.551
36
50.
Louisiana 
.566
10
4
.435
106
 
105.
Stanford
.394
3
9
.548
38
51.
Arkansas
.564
7
6
.541
44
 
106.
Mississippi State
.384
2
10
.593
10
52.
Sam Houston St.
.556
10
3
.391
130
 
107.
Akron
.379
4
8
.478
78
53.
Boston College
.552
7
6
.529
53
 
108.
Air Force
.378
5
7
.426
111
54.
Kansas
.548
5
7
.597
7
 
109.
Hawaii
.372
5
7
.420
117
55.
Virginia Tech
.548
6
7
.570
26
 
110.
Florida State
.366
2
10
.574
23
56.
Connecticut
.541
9
4
.424
113
 
111.
Eastern Michigan
.365
5
7
.412
122
57.
Georgia Southern
.541
8
5
.471
83
 
112.
Troy
.361
4
8
.459
91
58.
Michigan State
.537
5
7
.586
15
 
113.
Purdue
.354
1
11
.622
4
59.
Miami, Ohio
.534
9
5
.447
97
 
114.
UAB
.347
3
9
.496
68
60.
James Madison
.533
9
4
.416
119
 
115.
Georgia State
.343
3
9
.492
71
61.
Buffalo
.527
9
4
.410
124
 
116.
Utah State
.342
4
8
.439
102
62.
West Virginia
.524
6
7
.547
39
 
117.
Temple
.340
3
9
.490
75
63.
Wisconsin
.524
5
7
.573
24
 
118.
New Mexico
.329
5
7
.375
132
64.
Pittsburgh
.521
7
6
.497
67
 
119.
Central Michigan
.326
4
8
.421
115
65.
Texas State
.517
8
5
.448
96
 
120.
Louisiana Tech
.322
5
8
.386
131
66.
Arkansas State
.514
8
5
.444
98
 
121.
Nevada
.319
3
10
.478
79
67.
Washington State
.505
8
5
.436
105
 
122.
Wyoming
.313
3
9
.458
92
68.
Cincinnati
.503
5
7
.553
35
 
123.
Ball State
.307
3
9
.451
94
69.
East Carolina
.497
8
5
.427
109
 
124.
Florida Atlantic
.297
3
9
.440
100
70.
Northern Illinois
.496
8
5
.426
110
 
125.
Tulsa
.284
3
9
.424
112
71.
Maryland
.490
4
8
.591
12
 
126.
Fla. International
.281
4
8
.369
133
72.
Toledo
.490
8
5
.421
116
 
127.
San Diego State
.274
3
9
.412
123
73.
Auburn
.487
5
7
.537
47
 
128.
Massachusetts
.273
2
10
.468
85
74.
Northwestern
.485
4
8
.586
16
 
129.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.271
3
9
.409
125
75.
Virginia
.485
5
7
.535
48
 
130.
UTEP
.264
3
9
.400
127
76.
South Florida
.483
7
6
.460
88
 
131.
New Mexico St.
.257
3
9
.391
129
77.
Colorado State
.482
8
5
.414
120
 
132.
Southern Miss
.229
1
11
.471
82
78.
South Alabama
.482
7
6
.459
90
 
133.
Kennesaw St.
.223
2
10
.402
126
79.
Jacksonville St.
.481
9
5
.396
128
 
134.
Kent State
.183
0
12
.473
81
80.
Kentucky
.481
4
8
.581
20
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s tenth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2025 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved