Give Promo They Actually Want

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Texas A&M, Indiana, & Ohio St. Are #1-2-3

  • #4 BYU is the team being most overlooked by the committee and the polls—among the top-10, only #1 Texas A&M has matched the (10-1) Cougars’ 3 road wins versus current top-40 teams, and BYU has also beaten #13 Utah (at home)
  • There are three big gaps in the top-25: between #3 Ohio State and #4 BYU; between #12 Notre Dame and #13 Utah; and between #18 Miami and #19 Arizona State
  • The SEC leads all conferences with 8 top-25 teams, including 5 in the top-10
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 24

Nov. 17 Rankings
Final 2024-25 Rankings
Final24 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Final 2023-24 Rankings
Jan. 3, 2024 Rankings
Final 23 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched.
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Texas A&M .833 11 0 .556 39 0-0 1-0 0
2.
Indiana .828 11 0 .545 46 1-0 1-0 0
3.
Ohio State .823 11 0 .537 56 0-0 2-0 0
4.
BYU .801 10 1 .579 16 0-1 1-0 0
5.
Mississippi .796 10 1 .572 25 1-1 2-0 0
6.
Georgia .786 10 1 .557 38 1-1 1-0 0
7.
Oregon .781 10 1 .549 41 0-1 1-0 0
8.
Texas Tech .777 10 1 .543 50 1-0 1-1 0
9.
Oklahoma .767 9 2 .595 9 1-1 2-1 0
10.
Alabama .760 9 2 .586 10 1-1 1-0 1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Michigan .758 9 2 .584 13   Southeastern .657 54 6 .402
12.
Notre Dame .754 9 2 .578 17   Big Ten .613 44 10 .417
13.
Utah .738 9 2 .558 37   Big 12 .587 37 9 .398
14.
USC .730 8 3 .607 8   Atlantic Coast .550 39 22 .465
15.
Vanderbilt .729 9 2 .546 43   American Athletic .519 34 20 .441
16.
Tulane .721 9 2 .537 57   Mountain West .458 26 22 .433
17.
North Texas .718 10 1 .465 90   Sun Belt .442 27 29 .453
18.
Miami, Fla. .718 9 2 .532 59   Conference USA .392 19 29 .453
19.
Arizona State .695 8 3 .565 31   Mid-American .357 16 36 .470
20.
Texas .693 8 3 .563 33   *non-conference play        
21.
Virginia .686 9 2 .495 78    
22.
Tennessee .677 8 3 .545 47  
23.
Navy .676 8 2 .496 76  
24.
Washington .676 8 3 .544 49  
25.
Georgia Tech .676 9 2 .482 83  
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. Arizona .675 8 3 .543 51  
82.
Colorado .480 3 8 .618 5
27. James Madison .671 10 1 .410 118  
83.
Southern Miss .478 7 4 .397 126
28. Illinois .662 7 4 .585 11  
84.
Ohio .476 7 4 .395 128
29. LSU .661 7 4 .584 12  
85.
Rice .472 5 6 .500 70
30. South Florida .657 8 3 .522 62  
86.
Army .472 5 5 .472 87
31. Iowa State .651 7 4 .573 23  
87.
Temple .470 5 6 .497 74
32. Houston .650 8 3 .515 66  
88.
Toledo .466 7 4 .386 130
33. Missouri .643 7 4 .564 32  
89.
Stanford .463 4 7 .545 44
34. TCU .641 7 4 .562 35  
90.
Coastal Carolina .462 6 5 .435 102
35. SMU .640 8 3 .503 69  
91.
Florida Atlantic .462 4 7 .544 48
36. Iowa .638 7 4 .559 36  
92.
Central Michigan .454 7 4 .374 133
37. Pittsburgh .634 8 3 .497 73  
93.
Fla. International .451 6 5 .424 107
38. UNLV .627 9 2 .429 105  
94.
Jacksonville St. .444 7 4 .365 135
39. Wake Forest .627 8 3 .489 79  
95.
Miami, Ohio .444 6 5 .417 114
40. Cincinnati .619 7 4 .539 54  
96.
Michigan State .437 3 8 .576 20
41. Nebraska .618 7 4 .538 55  
97.
Georgia Southern .433 5 6 .460 91
42. San Diego State .606 9 2 .408 119  
98.
Louisiana Tech .430 6 5 .404 121
43. Memphis .605 8 3 .467 88  
99.
Virginia Tech .429 3 8 .569 28
44. Northwestern .602 6 5 .576 22  
100.
Syracuse .429 3 8 .568 29
45. N.C. State .599 6 5 .573 24  
101.
Arkansas .418 2 9 .616 6
46. New Mexico .590 8 3 .452 95  
102.
Marshall .416 5 6 .443 98
47. Old Dominion .584 8 3 .445 97  
103.
Texas State .415 5 6 .442 99
48. Louisville .581 7 4 .499 72  
104.
North Carolina .413 4 7 .495 77
49. Wisconsin .573 4 7 .651 2  
105.
Purdue .413 2 9 .611 7
50. Minnesota .572 6 5 .545 45  
106.
Louisiana  .411 5 6 .438 101
51. East Carolina .569 7 4 .487 81  
107.
Arkansas State .407 5 6 .433 104
52. Boise State .567 7 4 .485 82  
108.
Appalachian St. .395 5 6 .422 110
53. Duke .566 6 5 .539 53  
109.
Tulsa .394 4 7 .475 85
54. Kennesaw St. .561 8 3 .422 109  
110.
UAB .387 3 8 .525 61
55. Kentucky .554 5 6 .581 14  
111.
Delaware .377 5 6 .403 123
56. South Carolina .554 4 7 .633 4  
112.
South Alabama .374 4 7 .454 92
57. Connecticut .553 9 3 .400 125  
113.
Wyoming .363 4 7 .442 100
58. Mississippi State .553 5 6 .580 15  
114.
Air Force .353 3 8 .488 80
59. Auburn .550 5 6 .576 19  
115.
New Mexico St. .341 4 7 .419 111
60. Penn State .549 5 6 .576 21  
116.
Buffalo .340 5 6 .365 134
61. UTSA .547 6 5 .520 64  
117.
Kent State .336 4 7 .413 117
62. Rutgers .540 5 6 .567 30  
118.
San Jose State .333 3 8 .466 89
63. Baylor .535 5 6 .562 34  
119.
Liberty .327 4 7 .404 122
64. Hawaii .529 7 4 .447 96  
120.
Colorado State .324 2 9 .518 65
65. Kansas State .527 5 6 .555 40  
121.
Nevada .322 3 8 .453 93
66. Clemson .524 6 5 .497 75  
122.
LA Monroe .320 3 8 .452 94
67. Western Kentucky .522 8 3 .384 131  
123.
Akron .318 5 7 .363 136
68. Florida .521 3 8 .656 1  
124.
Ball State .318 4 7 .393 129
69. Kansas .519 5 6 .546 42  
125.
Oregon State .316 2 9 .508 68
70. Fresno State .517 7 4 .435 103  
126.
Oklahoma State .311 1 10 .570 26
71. Florida State .514 5 6 .541 52  
127.
Eastern Michigan .305 4 7 .379 132
72. Utah State .507 6 5 .480 84  
128.
Boston College .282 1 10 .535 58
73. Washington State .504 5 6 .531 60  
129.
Northern Illinois .281 3 8 .406 120
74. California .501 6 5 .473 86  
130.
Bowling Green .272 3 8 .396 127
75. UCLA .500 3 8 .637 3  
131.
Charlotte .271 1 10 .521 63
76. Missouri St. .499 7 4 .417 113  
132.
Georgia State .254 1 10 .499 71
77. West Virginia .496 4 7 .578 18  
133.
Sam Houston St. .251 2 9 .429 106
78. Western Michigan .496 7 4 .414 116  
134.
Mid. Tenn. St. .243 2 9 .418 112
79. Maryland .487 4 7 .569 27  
135.
UTEP .240 2 9 .414 115
80. Troy .483 7 4 .402 124  
136.
Massachusetts .155 0 10 .423 112
81. UCF .482 5 6 .509 67  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s twelfth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2025 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved