Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Alabama Prevails in OT, Stays #1

  • Alabama, Texas Tech, Utah, Texas, and Florida are the most accomplished teams so far this season
  • There are three separate groupings of teams in the top-10, as there's a .028-point gap between #4 and #5, a .024-point gap between #7 and #8, and a .020 gap between #10 and #11
  • The BCS is the reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and this coming weekend features two more matchups of top-25 teams: #25 South Carolina at #5 Florida, and #24 Air Force at #19 BYU
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 9

Nov. 2 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings
Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings
Oct. 5 Rankings
2007 Pre-Bowl Rankings
Final 2007-08 Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.819
10
0
.531
33
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Texas Tech
.813
10
0
.520
47
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Utah
.807
10
0
.512
53
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Texas
.800
9
1
.584
4
1-1
2-0
0
5.
Florida
.772
8
1
.551
20
1-0
1-0
1
6.
Boise State
.770
9
0
.456
90
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Oklahoma
.769
9
1
.539
28
0-1
2-0
0
8.
Georgia
.745
8
2
.579
7
0-2
1-0
0
9.
USC
.742
8
1
.511
54
0-0
1-0
1
10.
Penn State
.738
9
1
.498
65
0-0
1-0
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Missouri
.718
8
2
.545
27
  Big 12
.606
38
10
.426
12. Ohio State
.713
8
2
.539
29
  Atlantic Coast
.600
34
10
.431
13. North Carolina
.713
7
2
.554
17
  Southeastern
.581
33
8
.392
14. Michigan State
.712
9
2
.525
42
  Big East
.573
26
12
.461
15. Ball State
.696
9
0
.363
119
  Big Ten
.566
31
12
.431
16. Pittsburgh
.689
7
2
.526
40
  Mountain West
.523
25
11
.405
17. TCU
.688
9
2
.496
66
  Pac-10
.519
13
16
.550
18. Oklahoma State
.687
8
2
.507
58
  WAC
.458
17
18
.467
19. BYU
.681
9
1
.429
109
  Mid-American
.432
22
29
.473
20. Wake Forest
.676
6
3
.582
5
  Conference USA
.420
18
30
.495
21. Florida State
.674
7
2
.509
56
  Sun Belt
.360
11
25
.475
22. Cincinnati
.661
7
2
.493
68
  *non-conference play
23. Miami, Fla.
.656
6
3
.559
13
 
24. Air Force
.650
8
2
.467
87
 
25. South Carolina
.642
7
3
.524
44
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. Nebraska
.636
6
4
.579
8
  73. Akron
.474
5
4
.440
100
27. Virginia Tech
.629
6
3
.530
36
  74. Kansas State
.473
4
6
.533
32
28. Georgia Tech
.628
7
3
.508
57
  75. Louisiana Tech
.473
5
4
.440
101
29. California
.621
6
3
.522
45
  76. New Mexico
.469
4
7
.552
19
30. Connecticut
.620
6
3
.521
46
  77. Houston
.468
5
4
.435
107
31. Tulsa
.620
8
1
.372
118
  78. Northern Illinois
.462
5
4
.429
108
32. LSU
.619
6
3
.519
48
  79. Baylor
.456
3
7
.577
9
33. Northwestern
.618
7
3
.498
64
  80. Bowling Green
.455
5
5
.455
91
34. Central Michigan
.614
7
2
.443
96
  81. Purdue
.450
3
7
.572
10
35. Oregon State
.614
6
3
.514
50
  82. Wyoming
.445
4
6
.505
59
36. Navy
.613
6
3
.514
51
  83. UTEP
.438
4
5
.471
84
37. Mississippi
.612
5
4
.580
6
  84. Tennessee
.436
3
7
.558
14
38. Western Michigan
.610
8
2
.424
111
  85. N.C. State
.436
3
6
.537
30
39. Oregon
.604
7
3
.483
71
  86. Michigan
.434
3
7
.556
15
40. Vanderbilt
.601
5
4
.568
11
  87. Marshall
.425
4
5
.458
89
41. Minnesota
.600
7
3
.479
76
  88. Arizona State
.425
3
6
.526
41
42. West Virginia
.593
6
3
.493
69
  89. Memphis
.420
5
5
.420
112
43. Maryland
.592
6
3
.491
70
  90. UCLA
.412
3
6
.513
52
44. Kansas
.590
6
4
.531
34
  91. LA Lafayette
.411
5
4
.379
117
45. Kentucky
.589
6
4
.530
37
  92. Indiana
.409
3
7
.530
35
46. Virginia
.587
5
5
.587
1
  93. Fla. International
.405
4
5
.438
102
47. Iowa
.584
6
4
.524
43
  94. Florida Atlantic
.405
4
5
.438
103
48. Boston College
.581
6
3
.481
74
  95. Mississippi State
.402
3
6
.502
61
49. South Florida
.574
6
3
.474
83
  96. Temple
.400
3
6
.500
63
50. East Carolina
.570
6
3
.469
85
  97. Arkansas State
.386
4
5
.418
113
51. Rice
.557
7
3
.435
105
  98. Southern Miss
.382
4
6
.441
99
52. Wisconsin
.554
5
5
.554
16
  99. New Mexico State
.377
3
6
.475
81
53. Notre Dame
.549
5
4
.516
49
  100. Syracuse
.376
2
7
.546
25
54. Colorado
.548
5
5
.548
23
  101. Utah State
.361
2
8
.546
26
55. Arizona
.536
6
3
.435
106
  102. Mid. Tenn. St.
.352
3
6
.449
92
56. Duke
.531
4
5
.564
12
  103. Army
.328
3
7
.444
94
57. Illinois
.528
5
5
.528
38
  104. Iowa State
.328
2
8
.509
55
58. Arkansas
.526
4
6
.585
2
  105. Toledo
.314
2
7
.478
78
59. Louisville
.515
5
4
.482
72
  106. Tulane
.312
2
7
.476
80
60. Rutgers
.514
4
5
.548
24
  107. Central Florida
.305
2
7
.467
86
61. Buffalo
.510
5
4
.476
79
  108. Ohio
.304
2
8
.481
73
62. Hawaii
.502
5
5
.502
62
  109. Eastern Michigan
.298
2
8
.474
82
63. Clemson
.500
4
5
.534
31
  110. Miami, Ohio
.289
2
7
.448
93
64. Nevada
.499
5
4
.465
88
  111. UAB
.283
2
7
.442
98
65. San Jose State
.497
6
4
.437
104
  112. Washington State
.282
1
9
.528
39
66. Texas A&M
.492
4
6
.552
18
  113. LA Monroe
.275
3
7
.382
116
67. UNLV
.490
4
6
.550
21
  114. San Diego State
.262
1
9
.503
60
68. Troy
.488
6
3
.389
115
  115. Washington
.260
0
9
.584
3
69. Colorado State
.488
4
6
.548
22
  116. Idaho
.258
2
8
.425
110
70. Stanford
.480
5
5
.480
75
  117. Kent State
.257
2
7
.409
114
71. Auburn
.479
5
5
.479
77
  118. SMU
.255
1
9
.494
67
72. Fresno State
.476
5
4
.442
97
  119. North Texas
.218
1
9
.443
95

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2008 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved