The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Texas Widens Its Lead

  • Texas, Alabama, Penn St., Utah, and Boise St. are the most accomplished teams so far this season
  • Penn St. moves from #5 to #3 after its impressive win at Ohio St.
  • The Big 12 South has been amazing, with 2/3 of its teams in the national top-10 and no losses except to each other
  • Archrivals Oklahoma and Oklahoma St. are essentially tied at .755 (the Sooners lead by .0002)
  • The BCS is the reason why college football has the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and this coming weekend features 2 more top-10 matchups: #1 Texas travels to #10 Texas Tech (the Longhorns' 4th-straight test), and #6 Georgia battles #9 Florida
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 26

Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings
Oct. 5 Rankings
2007 Pre-Bowl Rankings
Final 2007-08 Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Texas
.834
8
0
.556
15
2-0
1-0
0
2.
Alabama
.819
8
0
.531
33
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Penn State
.812
9
0
.519
46
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Utah
.780
8
0
.470
81
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Boise State
.773
7
0
.459
91
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Georgia
.759
7
1
.544
22
0-1
0-0
0
7.
Oklahoma
.755
7
1
.539
26
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Oklahoma State
.755
7
1
.539
27
0-1
1-0
0
9.
Florida
.753
6
1
.550
20
0-0
1-0
1
10.
Texas Tech
.749
8
0
.427
108
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. USC
.744
6
1
.538
28
  Big 12
.605
38
10
.425
12. Ohio State
.715
7
2
.556
16
  Atlantic Coast
.596
33
10
.431
13. Missouri
.707
6
2
.565
11
  Big Ten
.585
31
10
.427
14. TCU
.703
8
1
.462
87
  Southeastern
.581
29
7
.391
15. Minnesota
.702
7
1
.472
79
  Big East
.566
25
12
.459
16. North Carolina
.700
6
2
.557
13
  Pac-10
.531
13
16
.561
17. Michigan State
.697
7
2
.535
30
  Mountain West
.518
23
11
.411
18. Florida State
.695
6
1
.476
71
  WAC
.451
17
18
.460
19. Tulsa
.693
7
0
.360
117
  Mid-American
.417
20
28
.467
20. Ball State
.692
8
0
.360
118
  Conference USA
.413
16
28
.495
21. Connecticut
.669
6
2
.521
44
  Sun Belt
.363
9
23
.494
22. BYU
.664
7
1
.429
107
  *non-conference play
23. Virginia
.655
5
3
.584
3
 
24. Pittsburgh
.637
5
2
.509
53
 
25. Miami, Fla.
.634
5
3
.561
12
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. California
.633
5
2
.505
55
  73. Buffalo
.464
3
4
.507
54
27. LSU
.632
5
2
.504
56
  74. Baylor
.459
3
5
.535
31
28. Georgia Tech
.627
6
2
.475
73
  75. Clemson
.457
3
4
.500
57
29. Oregon
.626
6
2
.474
74
  76. Nevada
.457
4
4
.457
94
30. Northwestern
.626
6
2
.474
75
  77. Indiana
.453
3
5
.528
35
31. Air Force
.623
6
2
.470
80
  78. UCLA
.447
3
5
.523
42
32. Maryland
.618
6
2
.465
84
  79. Texas A&M
.445
3
5
.520
45
33. Notre Dame
.617
5
2
.488
67
  80. UNLV
.439
3
5
.514
47
34. Vanderbilt
.617
5
3
.543
23
  81. Akron
.439
4
4
.439
100
35. Nebraska
.614
5
3
.540
25
  82. UTEP
.439
3
4
.482
70
36. Wake Forest
.614
4
3
.572
8
  83. Purdue
.433
2
6
.587
2
37. Duke
.608
4
3
.566
10
  84. Fla. International
.424
3
4
.467
83
38. Louisville
.606
5
2
.476
72
  85. Arizona State
.422
2
5
.553
19
39. South Florida
.604
6
2
.451
96
  86. Mississippi State
.419
3
5
.494
62
40. Oregon State
.599
4
3
.557
14
  87. Michigan
.419
2
6
.573
6
41. South Carolina
.598
5
3
.523
40
  88. Bowling Green
.418
3
5
.493
64
42. Virginia Tech
.597
5
3
.523
41
  89. Florida Atlantic
.413
3
5
.488
66
43. Central Michigan
.597
6
2
.444
99
  90. Temple
.409
3
5
.484
69
44. Navy
.597
5
3
.523
43
  91. LA Lafayette
.404
4
3
.364
116
45. Cincinnati
.594
5
2
.464
85
  92. Memphis
.400
4
5
.432
106
46. Boston College
.593
5
2
.462
86
  93. Louisiana Tech
.397
3
4
.438
101
47. Kentucky
.589
5
3
.514
48
  94. New Mexico State
.395
3
4
.437
102
48. Kansas
.587
5
3
.512
50
  95. Arkansas State
.393
4
3
.353
119
49. Colorado
.580
4
4
.580
4
  96. Marshall
.384
3
4
.425
109
50. West Virginia
.579
5
2
.448
97
  97. N.C. State
.381
2
6
.533
32
51. Mississippi
.574
4
4
.574
5
  98. Wyoming
.377
2
6
.529
34
52. Western Michigan
.572
6
2
.418
110
  99. Central Florida
.359
2
4
.457
93
53. Iowa
.568
5
3
.493
63
  100. Mid. Tenn. St.
.346
2
6
.496
60
54. Troy
.566
5
2
.436
103
  101. Toledo
.337
2
6
.486
68
55. Fresno State
.566
5
2
.435
104
  102. Southern Miss
.326
2
6
.473
76
56. Wisconsin
.556
4
4
.556
17
  103. Iowa State
.325
2
6
.472
78
57. Arizona
.548
5
3
.472
77
  104. Syracuse
.321
1
6
.542
24
58. East Carolina
.540
4
3
.497
59
  105. Tulane
.321
2
5
.445
98
59. Illinois
.535
4
4
.535
29
  106. Ohio
.320
2
6
.467
82
60. Rice
.535
5
3
.460
89
  107. Army
.318
3
5
.387
114
61. San Jose State
.531
5
3
.456
95
  108. Washington State
.315
1
7
.548
21
62. Hawaii
.526
4
4
.526
36
  109. UAB
.314
2
6
.459
90
63. Colorado State
.523
4
4
.523
39
  110. Eastern Michigan
.297
2
7
.458
92
64. Stanford
.512
4
4
.512
49
  111. Utah State
.294
1
7
.524
38
65. Kansas State
.509
4
4
.509
52
  112. Miami, Ohio
.292
2
6
.434
105
66. Houston
.504
4
3
.461
88
  113. SMU
.276
1
8
.512
51
67. Tennessee
.497
3
5
.572
7
  114. San Diego State
.274
1
7
.499
58
68. Arkansas
.495
3
5
.571
9
  115. Kent State
.269
2
6
.407
113
69. New Mexico
.493
4
5
.526
37
  116. Washington
.266
0
7
.591
1
70. Auburn
.488
4
4
.488
65
  117. Idaho
.257
2
7
.409
112
71. Northern Illinois
.487
5
3
.412
111
  118. LA Monroe
.241
2
6
.371
115
72. Rutgers
.478
3
5
.554
18
  119. North Texas
.196
0
8
.494
61

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2008 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved