Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Alabama Vaults to #1, Edging Penn State

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • Alabama nips Penn St. by .0000003
  • Alabama moves from #6 to #1, largely on the strength of wins by 5 of its previous 6 opponents, as the Tide’s strength of schedule rises from .530 to .549
  • Georgia dips to #3 after playing #101 Missouri
  • Seven weeks into the season, only 7 undefeated teams remain
  • The SEC takes over as the top conference, by .001
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 16

Oct. 9 Rankings

Final 2016-17 Rankings
Final ’16 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.830
7
0
.549
32
0-0
0-0
0
2.
Penn State
.830
6
0
.549
33
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Georgia
.823
7
0
.537
38
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Miami, Fla.
.817
5
0
.528
42
0-0
0-0
0
5.
TCU
.814
6
0
.523
45
0-0
0-0
0
6.
UCF
.813
5
0
.521
49
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Wisconsin
.802
6
0
.503
58
0-0
0-0
0
8.
USC
.775
6
1
.579
11
0-0
1-1
0
9.
Michigan State
.765
5
1
.583
10
0-0
2-1
0
10.
Clemson
.755
6
1
.552
27
0-0
0-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan
.754
5
1
.568
17
  Southeastern
.631
32
7
.432
12. N.C. State
.742
6
1
.535
39
  Big Ten
.630
32
10
.470
13. Notre Dame
.736
5
1
.544
34
  Pac-12
.604
27
7
.422
14. Ohio State
.732
6
1
.522
47
  Atlantic Coast
.598
30
11
.456
15. Washington St.
.724
6
1
.512
52
  Big 12
.533
20
10
.432
16. Stanford
.721
5
2
.605
6
  American Athletic
.530
23
14
.457
17. Iowa
.719
4
2
.631
2
  Mountain West
.460
20
23
.481
18. Memphis
.719
5
1
.523
46
  Mid-American
.425
21
27
.462
19. San Diego State
.714
6
1
.499
63
  Conference USA
.403
22
28
.438
20. Navy
.712
5
1
.514
51
  Sun Belt
.348
13
26
.445
21. South Carolina
.698
5
2
.577
12
  *non-conference play
22. South Florida
.697
6
0
.365
126
 
23. Washington
.696
6
1
.478
80
 
24. Kentucky
.695
5
1
.494
67
 
25. Oklahoma
.690
5
1
.488
70
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Oklahoma State
.689
5
1
.487
71
 
79.
Arkansas
.497
2
4
.597
8
27.
Virginia Tech
.683
5
1
.480
77
 
80.
UAB
.490
4
2
.391
119
28.
Texas A&M
.681
5
2
.557
25
 
81.
Florida Atlantic
.479
3
3
.479
79
29.
Virginia
.666
5
1
.461
91
 
82.
Ohio
.473
5
2
.347
129
30.
Boise State
.652
4
2
.556
26
 
83.
Louisiana Tech
.461
3
3
.461
90
31.
Florida State
.650
2
3
.703
1
 
84.
New Mexico
.442
3
3
.442
99
32.
Toledo
.647
5
1
.440
100
 
85.
Cincinnati
.437
2
5
.567
18
33.
Wake Forest
.639
4
2
.542
35
 
86.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.433
3
4
.476
83
34.
LSU
.637
5
2
.509
54
 
87.
Georgia State
.428
3
2
.370
124
35.
Florida
.628
3
3
.628
3
 
88.
Kansas State
.425
3
3
.425
110
36.
Mississippi State
.618
4
2
.519
50
 
89.
Utah State
.425
3
4
.467
88
37.
Marshall
.613
5
1
.405
118
 
90.
Illinois
.423
2
4
.524
44
38.
Auburn
.613
5
2
.484
74
 
91.
UTSA
.423
3
2
.366
125
39.
Arizona State
.613
3
3
.613
4
 
92.
Rutgers
.421
2
4
.522
48
40.
SMU
.607
4
2
.507
55
 
93.
Tulsa
.420
2
5
.550
29
41.
Oregon
.606
4
3
.564
20
 
94.
Pittsburgh
.419
2
5
.549
31
42.
Texas Tech
.603
4
2
.503
57
 
95.
Western Kentucky
.418
4
2
.324
130
43.
Iowa State
.601
4
2
.501
60
 
96.
LA Monroe
.412
3
3
.412
117
44.
California
.601
4
3
.559
22
 
97.
Buffalo
.409
3
4
.451
96
45.
Houston
.597
4
2
.496
65
 
98.
Arkansas State
.409
3
2
.352
127
46.
West Virginia
.595
4
2
.494
66
 
99.
Temple
.405
3
4
.447
98
47.
North Texas
.590
4
2
.490
69
 
100.
Air Force
.401
2
4
.501
61
48.
UCLA
.585
3
3
.585
9
 
101.
Missouri
.394
1
5
.603
7
49.
Utah
.581
4
2
.480
76
 
102.
Connecticut
.393
2
4
.492
68
50.
Northern Illinois
.576
4
2
.475
85
 
103.
Central Michigan
.393
3
4
.434
103
51.
Purdue
.575
3
3
.575
13
 
104.
New Mexico State
.390
3
4
.432
106
52.
Louisville
.573
4
3
.530
40
 
105.
Louisiana 
.381
3
3
.381
121
53.
Boston College
.570
3
4
.612
5
 
106.
Eastern Michigan
.378
2
4
.477
81
54.
Maryland
.568
3
3
.568
16
 
107.
South Alabama
.359
2
4
.457
95
55.
Syracuse
.568
4
3
.526
43
 
108.
Kent State
.357
2
5
.484
72
56.
Colorado State
.563
5
2
.432
105
 
109.
Oregon State
.346
1
6
.569
15
57.
Arizona
.561
4
2
.460
92
 
110.
North Carolina
.343
1
6
.566
19
58.
Troy
.560
4
2
.459
94
 
111.
UNLV
.339
2
4
.435
102
59.
Indiana
.558
3
3
.558
24
 
112.
Hawaii
.339
3
4
.379
123
60.
Fresno State
.552
4
2
.451
97
 
113.
BYU
.338
1
6
.561
21
61.
Texas
.552
3
3
.552
28
 
114.
Ball State
.334
2
4
.429
107
62.
Northwestern
.550
3
3
.550
30
 
115.
Old Dominion
.323
2
4
.418
113
63.
Duke
.550
4
3
.507
56
 
116.
East Carolina
.318
1
6
.539
37
64.
Army
.544
5
2
.413
116
 
117.
Miami, Ohio
.317
2
5
.440
101
65.
Minnesota
.540
3
3
.540
36
 
118.
Rice
.298
1
5
.498
64
66.
Georgia Tech
.535
3
2
.475
84
 
119.
Idaho
.295
2
4
.385
120
67.
Mississippi
.528
3
3
.528
41
 
120.
Nevada
.288
1
6
.503
59
68.
Nebraska
.527
3
4
.570
14
 
121.
Kansas
.283
1
5
.480
78
69.
Southern Miss
.526
4
2
.426
109
 
122.
Bowling Green
.257
1
6
.464
89
70.
Wyoming
.525
4
2
.424
112
 
123.
San Jose State
.244
1
7
.460
93
71.
Western Michigan
.519
4
3
.476
82
 
124.
Texas State
.229
1
6
.426
108
72.
Appalachian St.
.516
4
2
.416
114
 
125.
Baylor
.190
0
6
.484
73
73.
Vanderbilt
.516
3
4
.559
23
 
126.
UTEP
.188
0
7
.481
75
74.
Fla. International
.516
4
2
.415
115
 
127.
Coastal Carolina
.186
1
5
.348
128
75.
Colorado
.516
4
3
.473
86
 
128.
Georgia Southern
.160
0
5
.432
104
76.
Akron
.515
4
3
.472
87
 
129.
Charlotte
.156
0
7
.424
111
77.
Tennessee
.511
3
3
.511
53
 
130.
Massachusetts
.133
0
6
.380
122
78.
Tulane
.501
3
3
.501
62
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2017 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved