Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Auburn Remains #1

  • The nation's 5 remaining undefeated teams have won a total of 5 games versus the current top-25 — and #1 Auburn has won 4 of them
  • With its win over current-#30 USC on the road, undefeated Oregon jumps from #8 to #2
  • The LSU Tigers, who have 2 wins versus the current top-25 and whose only loss is on the road against #1 Auburn, are #3
  • Largely on the strength of its having beaten current-#28 Oregon St. and current-#31 Virginia Tech, undefeated Boise St. is #4
  • #5 Missouri is 1-1 versus the current top-10 and has 5 wins the current top-50, tied (with #7 Oklahoma) for most among the top-10 teams
  • From #3 to #9, the teams are all bunched together — as #9 Alabama is much closer to #3 LSU (they're separated by only .017) than #2 Oregon is to #1 Auburn (they're separated by .039)
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has the best regular season in all of sports, and this coming week will feature 5 more top-25 matchups: #9 Alabama at #3 LSU; #6 TCU at #8 Utah; #12 Arizona at #14 Stanford; #22 Baylor at #13 Oklahoma St.; and #19 Arkansas at #20 South Carolina
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Halloween

Oct. 24 Rankings

Oct. 17 Rankings

Oct. 10 Rankings

Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2009-10 Rankings
Final '09 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Auburn
.839
9
0
.565
20
1-0
3-0
0
2.
Oregon
.800
8
0
.499
60
0-0
1-0
0
3.
LSU
.788
7
1
.586
9
0-1
2-0
0
4.
Boise State
.785
7
0
.477
70
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Missouri
.781
7
1
.575
14
1-1
0-0
0
6.
TCU
.781
9
0
.471
72
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Oklahoma
.779
7
1
.572
16
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Utah
.774
8
0
.462
76
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Alabama
.771
7
1
.561
21
0-0
2-1
0
10.
Nebraska
.758
7
1
.542
32
1-0
1-0
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan State
.753
8
1
.526
38
  Big 12
.643
36
8
.446
12. Arizona
.740
7
1
.520
41
  Southeastern
.628
29
5
.406
13. Oklahoma State
.738
7
1
.517
45
  Pac-10
.602
21
9
.481
14. Stanford
.725
7
1
.500
57
  Big Ten
.581
35
8
.386
15. Ohio State
.722
8
1
.485
66
  Atlantic Coast
.518
27
15
.432
16. Wisconsin
.720
7
1
.494
63
  Mountain West
.497
16
18
.515
17. Mississippi State
.704
7
2
.543
31
  Big East
.485
23
15
.423
18. Iowa
.701
6
2
.558
22
  WAC
.484
21
17
.452
19. Arkansas
.698
6
2
.554
24
  Conference USA
.445
20
24
.472
20. South Carolina
.697
6
2
.553
25
  Mid-American
.359
15
35
.477
21. Florida
.674
5
3
.605
4
  Sun Belt
.295
4
26
.519
22. Baylor
.665
7
2
.498
61
  *non-conference play
23. Nevada
.658
7
1
.422
101
 
24. N.C. State
.657
6
2
.508
50
 
25. Florida State
.652
6
2
.502
55
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Illinois
.649
5
3
.577
12
 
74.
Army
.468
5
3
.394
113
27.
Hawaii
.644
7
2
.474
71
 
75.
Tennessee
.467
2
6
.619
2
28.
Oregon State
.642
4
3
.601
5
 
76.
Ohio
.466
6
3
.367
117
29.
Kansas State
.638
5
3
.566
18
 
77.
Virginia
.456
4
4
.456
79
30.
USC
.620
5
3
.546
30
 
78.
Connecticut
.453
4
4
.453
80
31.
Virginia Tech
.619
6
2
.467
74
 
79.
Indiana
.451
4
4
.451
81
32.
Central Florida
.610
6
2
.457
78
 
80.
Louisville
.445
4
4
.445
83
33.
Iowa State
.609
5
4
.577
13
 
81.
Idaho
.440
4
4
.440
89
34.
Penn State
.606
5
3
.532
35
 
82.
Troy
.436
4
3
.395
112
35.
Texas A&M
.600
5
3
.526
39
 
83.
Cincinnati
.432
3
5
.507
51
36.
North Carolina
.595
5
3
.521
40
 
84.
Louisiana Tech
.430
3
5
.506
52
37.
Texas
.595
4
4
.595
7
 
85.
Vanderbilt
.426
2
6
.579
11
38.
Miami, Fla.
.592
5
3
.518
42
 
86.
Boston College
.421
3
5
.496
62
39.
East Carolina
.589
5
3
.514
48
 
87.
Colorado State
.417
3
6
.517
43
40.
Michigan
.584
5
3
.509
49
 
88.
LA Monroe
.417
4
4
.417
106
41.
Northwestern
.579
6
2
.426
98
 
89.
UAB
.407
3
5
.481
68
42.
San Diego State
.576
6
2
.423
100
 
90.
Wyoming
.397
2
7
.568
17
43.
Maryland
.574
6
2
.420
102
 
91.
UTEP
.384
5
4
.353
119
44.
Texas Tech
.573
4
4
.573
15
 
92.
Utah State
.377
2
6
.529
36
45.
Northern Illinois
.568
7
2
.396
111
 
93.
Kent State
.371
4
4
.371
116
46.
Air Force
.560
5
4
.527
37
 
94.
Tulane
.369
3
5
.442
87
47.
Syracuse
.557
6
2
.403
109
 
95.
Wake Forest
.366
2
6
.517
44
48.
Pittsburgh
.553
5
3
.478
69
 
96.
Kansas
.365
2
6
.516
46
49.
Colorado
.551
3
5
.625
1
 
97.
Duke
.364
2
6
.515
47
50.
California
.550
4
4
.550
26
 
98.
Western Michigan
.359
3
5
.431
95
51.
Fresno State
.550
5
2
.419
104
 
99.
Marshall
.351
2
6
.502
56
52.
Georgia
.549
4
5
.582
10
 
100.
Rice
.350
2
6
.500
58
53.
West Virginia
.546
5
3
.471
73
 
101.
Arkansas State
.343
3
5
.414
107
54.
Temple
.544
7
2
.373
115
 
102.
Washington State
.340
1
8
.587
8
55.
Washington
.540
3
5
.614
3
 
103.
Buffalo
.320
2
6
.466
75
56.
Toledo
.539
6
3
.438
90
 
104.
UNLV
.317
1
7
.550
27
57.
Navy
.535
5
3
.459
77
 
105.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.313
3
4
.351
120
58.
Tulsa
.526
5
3
.451
82
 
106.
New Mexico State
.300
2
6
.443
85
59.
SMU
.524
5
4
.491
64
 
107.
Fla. International
.300
2
5
.420
103
60.
UCLA
.524
3
5
.599
6
 
108.
Florida Atlantic
.298
2
5
.418
105
61.
Georgia Tech
.518
5
3
.443
86
 
109.
San Jose State
.297
1
8
.538
33
62.
Kentucky
.516
4
5
.550
28
 
110.
Minnesota
.297
1
8
.538
34
63.
Notre Dame
.514
4
5
.547
29
 
111.
Bowling Green
.268
2
7
.423
99
64.
Southern Miss
.510
5
3
.435
91
 
112.
LA Lafayette
.266
2
6
.402
110
65.
Houston
.508
5
3
.433
93
 
113.
Memphis
.261
1
7
.482
67
66.
Clemson
.502
4
4
.502
54
 
114.
Central Michigan
.257
2
7
.409
108
67.
Arizona State
.500
4
4
.500
59
 
115.
Ball State
.232
2
7
.377
114
68.
Mississippi
.490
3
5
.565
19
 
116.
North Texas
.227
2
6
.353
118
69.
Purdue
.489
4
4
.489
65
 
117.
Western Kentucky
.220
1
7
.427
97
70.
BYU
.482
3
5
.557
23
 
118.
Eastern Michigan
.217
1
8
.433
94
71.
Rutgers
.477
4
3
.435
92
 
119.
New Mexico
.202
0
8
.503
53
72.
Miami, Ohio
.477
5
4
.444
84
 
120.
Akron
.164
0
9
.441
88
73.
South Florida
.471
4
3
.428
96
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2010 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved