Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Remains #1

  • TCU takes over the #2 spot after its win at #16 Texas
  • Washington’s win at then-#7 Oregon moves the Huskies to #19 and gives the Pac-12 five teams in the top-20—matching the SEC for the most of any conference
  • There continues to be a big gap (.026) between the top-5 and the rest of the field
  • Texas and #6 Alabama have played the nation’s two toughest schedules to date
  • The Big Ten has 3 teams in the top-10 but no other teams in the top-30
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 14

Nov. 7 Rankings
Oct. 31 Rankings

Final 2021-22 Rankings
Final ’21 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.835
10
0
.558
30
1-0
2-0
0
2.
TCU
.828
10
0
.546
40
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Ohio State
.821
10
0
.534
48
1-0
1-0
0
4.
Michigan
.804
10
0
.507
63
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Tennessee
.804
9
1
.590
13
2-1
0-0
0
6.
Alabama
.778
8
2
.623
2
0-2
3-0
0
7.
Clemson
.772
9
1
.543
42
0-0
2-1
0
8.
USC
.759
9
1
.525
54
0-0
0-1
0
9.
LSU
.754
8
2
.591
11
1-1
2-1
0
10.
Penn State
.741
8
2
.574
21
0-2
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
North Carolina
.730
9
1
.487
71
  Southeastern
.643
40
6
.410
12.
Mississippi
.724
8
2
.552
33
  Big 12
.636
25
5
.428
13.
Utah
.721
8
2
.548
39
  Pac-12
.596
25
9
.452
14.
Kansas State
.714
7
3
.605
8
  Atlantic Coast
.568
34
14
.441
15.
Oregon
.713
8
2
.539
44
  Big Ten
.554
32
10
.393
16.
Texas
.696
6
4
.642
1
  American Athletic
.490
23
19
.461
17.
UCLA
.693
8
2
.515
58
  Sun Belt
.470
31
22
.419
18.
Oklahoma State
.692
7
3
.579
19
  Conference USA
.405
19
24
.439
19.
Washington
.691
8
2
.513
59
  Mid-American
.400
18
30
.475
20.
Florida State
.687
7
3
.573
23
  Mountain West
.394
20
28
.443
21.
Notre Dame
.683
7
3
.570
26
  *non-conference play
22.
Coastal Carolina
.673
9
1
.420
112
 
23.
UCF
.670
8
2
.488
68
 
24.
Mississippi State
.669
6
4
.614
5
 
25.
N.C. State
.656
7
3
.539
45
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Troy
.653
8
2
.470
81
 
79.
Stanford
.487
3
7
.607
7
27.
Florida
.650
6
4
.593
10
 
80.
Southern Miss
.482
5
5
.482
74
28.
Oregon State
.646
7
3
.528
52
 
81.
Appalachian St.
.475
5
5
.475
79
29.
Tulane
.640
8
2
.456
88
 
82.
Rutgers
.471
4
6
.532
50
30.
Kansas
.639
6
4
.582
17
 
83.
Texas A&M
.465
3
7
.587
14
31.
Syracuse
.631
6
4
.574
22
 
84.
Indiana
.460
3
7
.582
18
32.
Illinois
.628
7
3
.509
62
 
85.
Louisiana 
.450
5
5
.450
91
33.
Cincinnati
.626
8
2
.441
98
 
86.
Georgia Southern
.450
5
5
.450
92
34.
Texas Tech
.622
5
5
.622
3
 
87.
North Texas
.447
6
5
.420
111
35.
Louisville
.621
6
4
.563
27
 
88.
Arizona State
.434
3
7
.556
31
36.
Wake Forest
.617
6
4
.559
29
 
89.
Utah State
.433
5
5
.433
100
37.
South Alabama
.617
8
2
.431
101
 
90.
LA Monroe
.432
4
6
.492
66
38.
UTSA
.615
8
2
.429
102
 
91.
California
.429
3
7
.551
35
39.
Liberty
.614
8
2
.428
103
 
92.
Georgia State
.428
4
6
.488
70
40.
Baylor
.612
6
4
.553
32
 
93.
Boston College
.427
3
7
.549
37
41.
Purdue
.603
6
4
.545
41
 
94.
UAB
.425
5
5
.425
104
42.
Kentucky
.600
6
4
.541
43
 
95.
Rice
.424
5
5
.424
105
43.
Minnesota
.598
7
3
.477
78
 
96.
Ball State
.423
5
5
.423
108
44.
Maryland
.598
6
4
.539
46
 
97.
Florida Atlantic
.421
5
5
.421
110
45.
Arkansas
.590
5
5
.590
12
 
98.
Virginia
.416
3
7
.538
47
46.
Iowa
.588
6
4
.528
51
 
99.
Bowling Green
.413
5
5
.413
117
47.
Oklahoma
.585
5
5
.585
15
 
100.
Buffalo
.412
5
5
.412
118
48.
South Carolina
.584
6
4
.524
55
 
101.
Kent State
.406
4
6
.465
83
49.
Washington State
.584
6
4
.524
57
 
102.
Eastern Michigan
.404
6
4
.347
131
50.
Michigan State
.573
5
5
.573
24
 
103.
Nebraska
.403
3
7
.524
56
51.
Pittsburgh
.571
6
4
.511
61
 
104.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.399
5
5
.399
124
52.
Duke
.569
7
3
.447
95
 
105.
Central Michigan
.390
4
6
.449
93
53.
Auburn
.558
4
6
.616
4
 
106.
UNLV
.388
4
6
.446
96
54.
Houston
.557
6
4
.496
64
 
107.
Army
.381
3
6
.480
75
55.
SMU
.552
6
4
.492
65
 
108.
Old Dominion
.363
3
7
.482
73
56.
BYU
.552
5
5
.552
34
 
109.
Navy
.361
3
7
.479
76
57.
East Carolina
.546
6
4
.486
72
 
110.
Colorado
.355
1
9
.611
6
58.
Missouri
.536
4
6
.596
9
 
111.
Tulsa
.355
3
7
.473
80
59.
Boise State
.534
7
3
.413
116
 
112.
Louisiana Tech
.349
3
7
.467
82
60.
Wisconsin
.532
5
5
.532
49
 
113.
UTEP
.346
4
6
.402
123
61.
Wyoming
.526
7
3
.404
121
 
114.
Texas State
.345
3
7
.462
84
62.
Iowa State
.526
4
6
.585
16
 
115.
Arkansas State
.344
3
7
.461
85
63.
Toledo
.524
7
3
.403
122
 
116.
Miami, Ohio
.342
4
6
.398
125
64.
Marshall
.521
6
4
.460
86
 
117.
Fla. International
.338
4
6
.394
127
65.
Fresno State
.517
6
4
.456
87
 
118.
Virginia Tech
.330
2
8
.512
60
66.
James Madison
.516
6
3
.415
114
 
119.
New Mexico State
.319
4
5
.349
130
67.
West Virginia
.515
4
6
.575
20
 
120.
Temple
.310
3
7
.423
107
68.
Arizona
.511
4
6
.571
25
 
121.
Northern Illinois
.304
3
7
.416
113
69.
Ohio
.510
7
3
.389
128
 
122.
Western Michigan
.303
3
7
.415
115
70.
Connecticut
.505
6
5
.478
77
 
123.
Northwestern
.299
1
9
.549
38
71.
San Diego State
.501
6
4
.441
99
 
124.
New Mexico
.281
2
8
.454
90
72.
Vanderbilt
.499
4
6
.559
28
 
125.
South Florida
.280
1
9
.526
53
73.
San Jose State
.496
6
3
.396
126
 
126.
Colorado State
.277
2
8
.449
94
74.
Air Force
.495
7
3
.375
129
 
127.
Hawaii
.262
2
9
.442
97
75.
Western Kentucky
.491
7
4
.409
119
 
128.
Charlotte
.248
2
9
.424
106
76.
Georgia Tech
.489
4
6
.549
36
 
129.
Nevada
.243
2
8
.406
120
77.
Memphis
.489
5
5
.489
67
 
130.
Akron
.227
1
9
.455
89
78.
Miami, Fla.
.488
5
5
.488
69
 
131.
Massachusetts
.205
1
9
.423
109

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2022 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved