Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Vaults from #5 to #1

  • The Bulldogs’ win over then-#1 Tennessee vaults them into the top spot
  • Georgia is the only team with a winning record versus the current top-10
  • There is a big gap (.032) between the top-5 and the rest of the field
  • Sixty percent of the top-15 (9 of 15 teams) are from either the SEC or Pac-12
  • The Big Ten, with only 3 teams in the current top-25, languishes in 5th place in the conference rankings—last among the Power Five conferences
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 7

Oct. 31 Rankings

Final 2021-22 Rankings
Final ’21 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.830
9
0
.550
31
2-0
0-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.821
9
0
.534
43
0-0
2-0
0
3.
TCU
.818
9
0
.529
50
0-0
3-0
0
4.
Michigan
.805
9
0
.507
63
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Tennessee
.801
8
1
.594
11
0-1
2-0
0
6.
Clemson
.769
8
1
.547
32
0-0
1-1
0
7.
Oregon
.761
8
1
.536
42
1-1
0-0
0
8.
Mississippi
.760
8
1
.534
44
0-0
0-1
0
9.
USC
.757
8
1
.531
49
0-0
0-1
0
10.
UCLA
.756
8
1
.529
51
0-1
1-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Alabama
.750
7
2
.600
6
  Southeastern
.646
40
6
.413
12.
LSU
.748
7
2
.597
8
  Big 12
.634
25
5
.426
13.
Penn State
.716
7
2
.558
25
  Pac-12
.593
25
9
.449
14.
North Carolina
.715
8
1
.477
75
  Atlantic Coast
.569
34
14
.442
15.
Utah
.707
7
2
.546
33
  Big Ten
.554
32
10
.393
16.
N.C. State
.706
7
2
.545
34
  American Athletic
.499
23
18
.462
17.
Texas
.699
6
3
.607
3
  Sun Belt
.473
29
22
.432
18.
Kansas State
.697
6
3
.605
4
  Conference USA
.405
19
24
.439
19.
Notre Dame
.687
6
3
.594
10
  Mid-American
.401
18
30
.476
20.
Mississippi State
.685
6
3
.592
13
  Mountain West
.390
20
28
.439
21.
Tulane
.685
8
1
.441
94
  *non-conference play
22.
Liberty
.675
8
1
.430
106
 
23.
Oklahoma State
.673
6
3
.579
16
 
24.
Coastal Carolina
.672
8
1
.427
108
 
25.
Kansas
.669
6
3
.574
18
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Illinois
.664
7
2
.497
66
 
79.
Memphis
.476
4
5
.509
62
27.
Florida State
.662
6
3
.567
23
 
80.
Connecticut
.472
5
5
.472
80
28.
Washington
.658
7
2
.490
68
 
81.
Western Kentucky
.471
6
4
.412
119
29.
Syracuse
.658
6
3
.562
24
 
82.
West Virginia
.470
3
6
.571
20
30.
UCF
.646
7
2
.477
76
 
83.
Bowling Green
.462
5
4
.429
107
31.
Troy
.646
7
2
.477
77
 
84.
San Diego State
.459
5
4
.426
111
32.
Kentucky
.642
6
3
.545
35
 
85.
Buffalo
.458
5
4
.425
113
33.
Wake Forest
.637
6
3
.540
38
 
86.
Indiana
.455
3
6
.556
26
34.
Louisville
.635
6
3
.537
41
 
87.
Arizona State
.453
3
6
.554
27
35.
Baylor
.632
6
3
.534
45
 
88.
Arizona
.453
3
6
.554
28
36.
Oregon State
.630
6
3
.532
47
 
89.
Miami, Fla.
.451
4
5
.484
72
37.
Florida
.628
5
4
.597
9
 
90.
Vanderbilt
.451
3
6
.552
29
38.
Oklahoma
.624
5
4
.592
12
 
91.
Rice
.445
5
4
.412
118
39.
Maryland
.620
6
3
.521
57
 
92.
Ball State
.441
5
4
.409
120
40.
South Carolina
.619
6
3
.519
58
 
93.
Virginia
.439
3
6
.540
37
41.
Arkansas
.610
5
4
.578
17
 
94.
California
.437
3
6
.538
40
42.
Cincinnati
.609
7
2
.438
99
 
95.
Utah State
.415
4
5
.447
92
43.
South Alabama
.609
7
2
.438
101
 
96.
Louisiana 
.408
4
5
.441
95
44.
UTSA
.606
7
2
.435
103
 
97.
UNLV
.407
4
5
.439
97
45.
Minnesota
.590
6
3
.489
69
 
98.
Nebraska
.402
3
6
.503
64
46.
East Carolina
.585
6
3
.485
71
 
99.
UAB
.399
4
5
.432
105
47.
Texas Tech
.583
4
5
.615
2
 
100.
Eastern Michigan
.398
5
4
.367
131
48.
Washington State
.572
5
4
.539
39
 
101.
Old Dominion
.394
3
6
.494
67
49.
BYU
.568
5
5
.568
22
 
102.
Florida Atlantic
.394
4
5
.426
110
50.
Purdue
.565
5
4
.532
48
 
103.
Army
.389
3
5
.462
83
51.
Iowa
.560
5
4
.527
53
 
104.
LA Monroe
.387
3
6
.487
70
52.
Michigan State
.558
4
5
.590
14
 
105.
Tulsa
.377
3
6
.476
78
53.
Houston
.558
5
4
.524
54
 
106.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.376
4
5
.408
121
54.
Duke
.557
6
3
.456
87
 
107.
Miami, Ohio
.376
4
5
.408
123
55.
Pittsburgh
.557
5
4
.523
55
 
108.
Kent State
.376
3
6
.474
79
56.
Wisconsin
.555
5
4
.522
56
 
109.
Navy
.364
3
6
.462
84
57.
SMU
.550
5
4
.517
59
 
110.
Boston College
.363
2
7
.533
46
58.
San Jose State
.543
6
2
.390
127
 
111.
Fla. International
.361
4
5
.393
126
59.
Iowa State
.540
4
5
.573
19
 
112.
Louisiana Tech
.357
3
6
.455
89
60.
Missouri
.537
4
5
.570
21
 
113.
Texas State
.354
3
6
.451
90
61.
Auburn
.534
3
6
.632
1
 
114.
Colorado
.352
1
8
.599
7
62.
Wyoming
.527
6
3
.426
109
 
115.
Central Michigan
.352
3
6
.449
91
63.
Boise State
.523
6
3
.422
115
 
116.
UTEP
.351
4
6
.408
122
64.
Georgia Tech
.518
4
5
.551
30
 
117.
Western Michigan
.342
3
6
.438
100
65.
Appalachian St.
.511
5
4
.478
74
 
118.
Virginia Tech
.332
2
7
.498
65
66.
Southern Miss
.503
5
4
.469
82
 
119.
Temple
.319
3
6
.413
117
67.
Stanford
.502
3
6
.602
5
 
120.
Arkansas State
.316
2
7
.480
73
68.
Ohio
.498
6
3
.398
124
 
121.
New Mexico State
.307
3
5
.374
130
69.
Toledo
.497
6
3
.397
125
 
122.
Northwestern
.300
1
8
.541
36
70.
James Madison
.495
5
3
.420
116
 
123.
South Florida
.289
1
8
.528
52
71.
Marshall
.495
5
4
.461
85
 
124.
New Mexico
.288
2
7
.447
93
72.
Fresno State
.490
5
4
.457
86
 
125.
Colorado State
.281
2
7
.439
98
73.
Texas A&M
.489
3
6
.589
15
 
126.
Northern Illinois
.270
2
7
.425
112
74.
Georgia Southern
.488
5
4
.455
88
 
127.
Charlotte
.266
2
8
.435
102
75.
Air Force
.484
6
3
.384
129
 
128.
Hawaii
.264
2
8
.432
104
76.
Rutgers
.483
4
5
.516
60
 
129.
Akron
.244
1
8
.470
81
77.
North Texas
.482
6
4
.422
114
 
130.
Nevada
.242
2
7
.389
128
78.
Georgia State
.476
4
5
.509
61
 
131.
Massachusetts
.223
1
8
.441
96

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s ninth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2022 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved